Conversation

Notices

  1. The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. @ponydude2143 I did Fav it.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:54:52 UTC from web
    2. @ponydude2143 Done.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:56:12 UTC from web
    3. @ponydude2143 What if we don't agree/care? Besides which, they can't actually reintegrate at this stage

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:56:52 UTC from web
    4. @ponydude2143 Two clicks is hardly a bother.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:57:27 UTC from web
    5. @ponydude2143 Nah, I'm good

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:57:54 UTC from web
    6. @ponydude2143 In fact the entire tone of the post in question is more or less "We cannot integrate, wah"

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:58:46 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    7. @ponydude2143 I MISS WHEN THERE WERE FEWER OPINIONS THAT DIFFERED FROM MY OWN. BRING BACK OLD RDN.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 11:59:15 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    8. @ponydude2143 Sorry, but... why, exactly? There's nothing stopping the people on the RP from hanging out here.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:01:11 UTC from web
    9. @ponydude2143 If they wanted to be part of a community they could /post here as well/. It's not exactly a revolutionary context. They can run the stories there, and make OOC posts here. I'm all but certain that was the intent when the split happened.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:01:22 UTC from web
      1. @ceruleanspark Exactly that.

        Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:02:31 UTC from web
    10. @greydragon412 RPing here is against the rules because when the site was launching it was freaking ridiculous and it actually wasn't possible to follow a conversation. What I'm saying is that there's nothing stopping the users making their out-of-character posts over here and generally chatting to new people.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:05:48 UTC from web
    11. @ponydude2143 So you're grumpy because you couldn't get into the RP hierarchy, and you think that's going to be far more possible if you bring them over here? "Hmm, I can't unlock this box. Maybe if I move it to a different room. Nope, still locked."

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:08:35 UTC from web
    12. @greydragon412 It's a site for social networking between people with a common interest (Ponies). Whether you find that pointless is up to you.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:10:32 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    13. @greydragon412 The fact of the matter is that RPers complained they didn't have enough space, non-RPers complained that they didn't have enough space, and the split gave everyone what they wanted.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:11:50 UTC from web
    14. @ponydude2143 If you don't want to live and breath RP... then don't RP?

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:13:25 UTC from web
    15. @ponydude2143 @greydragon412 You seem to be implying that conversations between people aren't a purpose in and of themselves?

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:13:55 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    16. @ponydude2143 What metric are you using?

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:15:29 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    17. @ponydude2143 Yes, a single isolated question mark is a good argument for me to respond to.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:18:24 UTC from web
    18. @ponydude2143 And how does this metric rank conversational quality?

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:19:13 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    19. @greydragon412 Actually, there has been a bit of long convo here. at least when I've been here.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:19:56 UTC from web
    20. @ponydude2143 What? What I'm saying is that if you don't want to RP, don't, and if you do, there's a place for that!

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:22:00 UTC from web
    21. @greydragon412 I tend to throw topics at the wall until I start getting responses. I think part of the reason ponies as a topic falls flat is because we've largely reached consensus on most talking points.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:23:01 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    22. @ponydude2143 There's nothing stopping you doing that!

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:25:27 UTC from web
    23. @greydragon412 Well, I'm seeing my name coming up in people replies a lot, so I'm happy.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:25:52 UTC from web
    24. @ponydude2143 Nobody is going to complain if you do that. (Or to be accurate, nobody in the enforcement department).

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:26:34 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    25. @ponydude2143 Then who ARE you worried about?

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:31:00 UTC from web
    26. @ponydude2143 So instead of starting a massive argument, demanding others agree with your opinion, and calling people names, you could have just sent a DM to any given admin and mod and said, 'oh hey, could I just clarify part of the rules?'

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:34:16 UTC from web
    27. @ponydude2143 You said my point of allowing people to do whatever the hell they want was closed-minded (what), and that implied that I had a childlike selfishness.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:39:51 UTC from web
    28. @ponydude2143 Thank you, I appreciate that. And honestly, if in doubt, just carry on doing whatever you want. It's what I do.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:47:53 UTC from web
      1. @thelastgherkin What about me. Can I just do whatever I want?

        Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:48:39 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
        1. @ceruleanspark Within reason.

          Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:50:12 UTC from web
          1. @thelastgherkin Your reason or my reason

            Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:50:51 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
    29. @ponydude2143 @ceruleanspark My reason.

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:52:16 UTC from web
    30. @ponydude2143 Some ponies just want to watch the world burn

      Thursday, 05-Jan-12 12:52:30 UTC from StatusNet Desktop