Michael (egnaroesroh)'s status on Friday, 16-Dec-11 15:44:43 UTC
-
@nerthos The point I want to try and make here is that you both have valid arguments. The problem I read: (I speak for no one else)have with your option is that if you succeed then you'd basically have given up hope that there's a better solution by ignoring everyone elses possibly better solution. What's worse is that the way you say this is that you don't care whether people dislike your way of thinking they just have to deal with it. This means that it is very possible that you and a very select few will be happy. In other words you're being a tyrant who keeps those few you care about, the ones who believe in your way of doing things,from killing each other and instead killing off those who have different opinions from yours regardless of whether their opinions were still that murder is not good. This is why I take a different side from both of you. Id rather take a law that can change given time and the willingness to do so that makes mistakes over one who ignore all but themselves
