Replies to optimus, page 8

  1. @optimus Posey*

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:16:49 UTC from web in context
  2. @optimus Are you not amused?

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:14:55 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  3. @optimus !Posey much. I mean pretty much.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:12:06 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  4. @optimus Now RDN is about posey. It should be renamed PSN

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:11:48 UTC from web in context
  5. @optimus i have no idea what's going to be honest that's what i wanted to know

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:11:08 UTC from web in context
  6. @optimus http://ur1.ca/5ke5m

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:10:30 UTC from web in context
  7. @optimus Yeah. Some random guy on deviantart went on started yelling at @thelastgherkin about some G1 pony named !Posey for reasons we were never quite able to define. His messages were basically just the word "posey" in allcaps strung together with random other wrods.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:08:49 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  8. @optimus No, POSEY IS FLUTTERSHY BUT WITHOUT WINGS

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:08:04 UTC from web in context
  9. @optimus !Posey should !posey !posey

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:04:58 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  10. @optimus Old news, now the discussion is !posey.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:02:54 UTC from web in context
  11. @optimus im already ahead of you in a way

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 17:00:22 UTC from web in context
  12. @optimus not at school i cant im too busy more or less

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:57:55 UTC from web in context
  13. @optimus as am i but im pretty tired today im missing an hour of sleep

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:54:50 UTC from web in context
  14. @optimus good man bro so how are u

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:50:47 UTC from web in context
  15. @optimus are you re-watching it or are you kinda new to mlp

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:48:23 UTC from web in context
  16. @optimus love ponies what episode

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:46:35 UTC from web in context
  17. @optimus It's like overclock. If you do it right, your pc runs faster. If you do it wrong, your pc dies.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:59:33 UTC from web in context
  18. @optimus Still you need to be sure you can retain a degree of rational reasoning. If you don't, you'll simply end in a mental institution xD

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:56:14 UTC from web in context
  19. @optimus It's not about supressing it, it's about fueling it until it kills itself.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:53:51 UTC from web in context
  20. @optimus I wouldn't be telling you to do something i wasn't able to do myself.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:53:23 UTC from web in context
  21. @optimus Just use it to force yourself to a breakdown and then reconfigure your psyche to be more efficient.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:49:23 UTC from web in context
  22. @optimus That's exactly why i choose to throw them to a fire.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:47:21 UTC from web in context
  23. @optimus Of course. I have no doubt about it. Happyness is overrated. And with all the knowledge, kiwi, i could just create happyness out of thing air and sell it like fresh bread.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:44:46 UTC from web in context
  24. @optimus Do not fool yourself thinking i had a easy life. I just choose knowledge and power over emotion and happyness. It's a bit difficult to psychologically kill yourself to be able to rebuild your mind at will, but it's worth it.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:40:47 UTC from web in context
  25. @optimus But it's still awesome. I've spent the three last years of my life inmersed in phylosophy and theology, studying the concept and nature of gods as far as i can comprehend, for it's the only thing i think it's worth a lifetime of pursuit.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:37:10 UTC from web in context
  26. @optimus We would probably erase existence in the process, not just kill ourselves.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:32:55 UTC from web in context
  27. @optimus It's the kind of thing we as humans and ponies aren't meant to comprehend. They're advanced abstract concepts, and as such we aren't able to try them. And it would be unwise to do it nonetheless.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:30:36 UTC from web in context
  28. @optimus Yes. A omnipotent being in theory could destroy another one, but that second one should be able to whitstand it. And that would mean the end of existence. Of course my ego isn't great enough to think i completely understand godlike beings within a mortal form. That would be simply stupid.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:24:02 UTC from web in context
  29. @optimus We're on phylosophy now. Without ignorance the knowledge would be absolute. Absolute knowledge means godhood. And in a field of gods there's no concept of death, violence or war. Absolute beings don't even have those needs, for they are complete. But with more than one absolute entity, there would be no true absolute, because each omnipotence would neglect the other. That means, an static and incomplete universe for eternity.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:19:56 UTC from web in context
  30. @optimus Without it the world would run smoothly, but at the same time, without it we would all be gods, and the concept of omnipotence would be neglected.

    Monday, 31-Oct-11 10:10:43 UTC from web in context