Notices tagged with gnusocial, page 7
-
No way to know whether I'll succeed in this, but I'm planning to submit at least one patch each to #GNU_Social and #Friendica in 2017. And to try to help create better docs for both projects.
-
Verschiedene Admins von Instanzen haben offenbar das Problem mit den Daemons resp. der zu ändernden Route Table noch nicht mitbekommen. !gnusocial
https://gnusocial.de/notice/10639719 -
Again with the same issue on !gnusocial : remind to kiil manually all daemon afater use stopdameon . Must search for another IP ?
-
@shnoulle 60 is the original default. Nothing should ever take more than 60 seconds to complete for a webserver that remote users can initiate requests for (i.e. link stuff that gets looked up by your !GNUsocial server). If it was up to me I'd set it to 30 seconds or something.
oEmbed etc, which in combination with StoreRemoteMedia does remote downloads, has an upper limit anyway on how large files to download (so 30 seconds should be reasonable unless your server is on a really slow connection). -
Verschiedene Admins von Instanzen haben offenbar das Problem mit den Daemons resp. der zu ändernden Route Table noch nicht mitbekommen. !gnusocial
https://gnusocial.de/notice/10639719 -
Again with the same issue on !gnusocial : remind to kiil manually all daemon afater use stopdameon . Must search for another IP ?
-
Reminder for !gnusocial / !postactiv admins: It would be a good idea to blackhole requests to/from 91.121.67.58 since it can otherwise mess up your queue and halt federation.
Linux instructions for doing so: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/how-do-i-drop-or-block-attackers-ip-with-null-routes.html -
Reminder for !gnusocial / !postactiv admins: It would be a good idea to blackhole requests to/from 91.121.67.58 since it can otherwise mess up your queue and halt federation.
Linux instructions for doing so: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/how-do-i-drop-or-block-attackers-ip-with-null-routes.html -
Reminder for !gnusocial / !postactiv admins: It would be a good idea to blackhole requests to/from 91.121.67.58 since it can otherwise mess up your queue and halt federation.
Linux instructions for doing so: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/how-do-i-drop-or-block-attackers-ip-with-null-routes.html -
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
I'm perfectly happy that #Mastodon exists, and if it implements #ActivityPub in a future version, more power to it. And if it drops #OStatus support, well, that's what forks (or reimplementations) like #Mastodon are for. But don't blame #GNUsocial developers for not following #Mastodon's road map for the future.
-
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
I'm perfectly happy that #Mastodon exists, and if it implements #ActivityPub in a future version, more power to it. And if it drops #OStatus support, well, that's what forks (or reimplementations) like #Mastodon are for. But don't blame #GNUsocial developers for not following #Mastodon's road map for the future.
-
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
I'm perfectly happy that #Mastodon exists, and if it implements #ActivityPub in a future version, more power to it. And if it drops #OStatus support, well, that's what forks (or reimplementations) like #Mastodon are for. But don't blame #GNUsocial developers for not following #Mastodon's road map for the future.
-
How well known is it amongst #Mastodon users that their privacy features don't really work outside of their own instance? Perhaps some admins know, but much of the flaming is coming from people angry that #GNUsocial doesn't follow the privacy conventions of #Mastodon. But being angry that the #GNUsocial developer(s) aren't creating the same illusion of privacy is really misdirected anger.
-
@samy Das ist eine grundlegende Frage: willst du dich auf einen Dienst und seine Willkür verlassen - oder nutzt du lieber einen Dienst, der auf Grund seiner technischen Struktur kaum willkürlich handeln kann.
#GNUSocial (und seine Vorläufer) existieren fast ebenso lange wie Twitter, seit 2008 um genau zu sein. In dieser Zeit wurde ein Netzwerk aufgebaut, das unabhängig von finanziellen Interessen besteht. Alles freiwillig, vieles schlicht aus Überzeugung. Das Netzwerk ist mittlerweile hunderte Server groß und bietet tausenden Nutzern eine Alternative.
Um auf deine Ausgangsfrage zurück zukommen, eine Analogie:
Wozu gibt es !Freifunk? Das ist doch nur eine weitere Infrastruktur mit noch mehr Arbeit und den selben Menschen und am Ende bietet es ja doch im Prinzip "das Gleiche". -
@samy Das ist eine grundlegende Frage: willst du dich auf einen Dienst und seine Willkür verlassen - oder nutzt du lieber einen Dienst, der auf Grund seiner technischen Struktur kaum willkürlich handeln kann.
#GNUSocial (und seine Vorläufer) existieren fast ebenso lange wie Twitter, seit 2008 um genau zu sein. In dieser Zeit wurde ein Netzwerk aufgebaut, das unabhängig von finanziellen Interessen besteht. Alles freiwillig, vieles schlicht aus Überzeugung. Das Netzwerk ist mittlerweile hunderte Server groß und bietet tausenden Nutzern eine Alternative.
Um auf deine Ausgangsfrage zurück zukommen, eine Analogie:
Wozu gibt es !Freifunk? Das ist doch nur eine weitere Infrastruktur mit noch mehr Arbeit und den selben Menschen und am Ende bietet es ja doch im Prinzip "das Gleiche". -
There's the idea of organizing a #hackathon for #gnusocial.
Firs location proposal was #Leipzig.
Who of you would be interested in a #hackathon?
#fediversefav. : I'm in
boost : let's spread it to make it succsed -
I love #GNUSocial.
-
I love #GNUSocial.
-
There's the idea of organizing a #hackathon for #gnusocial.
Firs location proposal was #Leipzig.
Who of you would be interested in a #hackathon?
#fediversefav. : I'm in
boost : let's spread it to make it succsed -
@deadsuperhero what do find more attractive about it than #Diaspora or #GNUSocial? The lack of full #OStatus support (eg !groups) put me off
-
There's the idea of organizing a #hackathon for #gnusocial.
Firs location proposal was #Leipzig.
Who of you would be interested in a #hackathon?
#fediversefav. : I'm in
boost : let's spread it to make it succsed
