Replies to toksyuryel, page 9
-
@toksyuryel Anything that can be cited in the show will almost certainly be cool. (Not saying "definitely" because I don't want anyone dropping racism on us and saying "But they were racist against Zecora, so it must be fine to be racist!" or anything similar) :P
-
@toksyuryel I don't distrust you, just giving a heads up.
-
@toksyuryel @snowcone Careful, now, yous twos.
-
@toksyuryel I take it that's a host suggestion?
-
@toksyuryel I'll be home soon~ *kisskiss*
-
@toksyuryel Ooh. :o Can't wait to get home and have a bash (or a zsh) at this. :D
-
@toksyuryel Ooh, look what I found in that guide you sent me: http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/sedawk.html *saves for reading this evening*
-
@toksyuryel If you did multiple alternatives via non-capturing groups, I think you could just about do it. It would be a terrible, terrible idea, is all. :b
-
@toksyuryel But yeah, for sure a regex is not the right tool here.
-
@toksyuryel I think a regex with sufficiently strong lookaround capabilities probably could. It'd be a horrendous mess, though, so far better to break out awk. :)
-
@toksyuryel I really need to learn how to work with that, heh. I'm continually amazed by what it can do in the right hands. :)
-
@toksyuryel Dang. I'll leave it until I get home and can have a proper think about it, then.
-
@toksyuryel *ripped off
-
@toksyuryel In the meantime, if the flavour of regex you're using (I assume grep's) supports enough of it, I suggest http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html
-
@toksyuryel Maybe I could help with this when I get home, if you're still stuck?
-
@toksyuryel Why not change it up for once?
-
@toksyuryel Oh, right. Sorry, I'm not so good without access to a reference and/or a means of testing.
-
@toksyuryel Ah, yes. I think you'd have to use a look-backward expression, if that's even available. I don't see why it'd match very little, though; the [^"] blocks ought to match any non-" character.
-
@toksyuryel Sure you don't want me in that?
-
@toksyuryel This would be a lot easier if I had a way to test on mobile, heh. I /think/ that ought to work, though.
-
@toksyuryel Hmm... '[^"]*#[^"]*' ?
-
@toksyuryel Might be easier to come up with a concise one if I knew what the specific strings were.
-
@toksyuryel Put the parts which aren't allowed in a [^] block?
-
@toksyuryel You can match my string any day
-
@toksyuryel wouldnt that be sea water?
-
@toksyuryel sounds.. interesting
-
@toksyuryel and what do you do on that game?
-
@toksyuryel but what exactly is that >_> ?
-
@toksyuryel what is this?
-
@toksyuryel There should be a new button above the public timeline.
