Replies to celestiaforequestria, page 37

  1. @celestiaforequestria I mean, is it supposed to be a horror movie?

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 05:40:04 UTC from web in context
  2. @celestiaforequestria Agreed.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 05:30:49 UTC from web in context
  3. @celestiaforequestria life-sized TARDIS cake... inside the TARDIS? my tiny hummingbird brain just exploded

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 01:53:42 UTC from web in context
  4. @celestiaforequestria Yes but nothing compared to my !HUGS

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 01:53:30 UTC from web in context
  5. @celestiaforequestria I got over 1000 letters, in 2 seconds

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 01:51:09 UTC from web in context
  6. @celestiaforequestria CATHERINE TATE!?

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 01:51:07 UTC from StatusNet iPhone in context
  7. @celestiaforequestria Papyrus is good choice if you want something with a bit of flair.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:49:40 UTC from web in context
  8. @celestiaforequestria We'll see how it comes out. It'll probably end up on my DA in a week or two. I've still got a lot of content to fill before it's even close. I've got a few "news" stories from the future, but coming up with things without pushing it too far is difficult. I've always thought of myself as funny, but with others I'm pretty hit or miss it seems.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:48:48 UTC from web in context
  9. @celestiaforequestria Ah... I've got a real roundup open for reference, so I'll see how close I can get. As far as fonts go, I'm a graphic designer's worst nightmare. I've pretty much always used whatever comes up as default. Needless to say, I've never done anything presentation quality before.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:44:01 UTC from web in context
  10. @celestiaforequestria thank ya

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:34:09 UTC from StatusNet iPhone in context
  11. @celestiaforequestria Is it just Arial for everything? I tried to match some of the titles and accents and couldn't get the size to fit exact. Maybe I'm just not a clever pony...

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:33:19 UTC from web in context
  12. @celestiaforequestria 3

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:28:13 UTC from web in context
  13. @celestiaforequestria Birds and aquatic mammals. Things like beavers, otters, platypus. Hippos.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:28:07 UTC from web in context
  14. @celestiaforequestria This was what I was thinking about, but just matching the usual EqD font was the goal. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-o-SNdck_ebM/Tk9pBR8_kAI/AAAAAAAAKwY/PYeVS_oQESQ/s1600/47312+-+Equestria_Daily+future+the_future.png

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:24:59 UTC from web in context
  15. @celestiaforequestria M

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:15:57 UTC from web in context
  16. @celestiaforequestria Wesponse

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:14:17 UTC from web in context
  17. @celestiaforequestria Hrhmfsnort.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:13:49 UTC from web in context
  18. @celestiaforequestria Wii.

    Sunday, 21-Aug-11 00:13:04 UTC from web in context
  19. @celestiaforequestria sure thing so do you have a skype ??

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 23:40:10 UTC from web in context
  20. @celestiaforequestria well im listening to some music and im downloading a video clip from youtube for a future brony tv video

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 23:37:42 UTC from web in context
  21. @celestiaforequestria I didn't ask what you were doing.

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 23:31:41 UTC from web in context
  22. @celestiaforequestria wtf

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 23:29:57 UTC from web in context
  23. @celestiaforequestria hey what's up

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 23:27:23 UTC from web in context
  24. @celestiaforequestria SO MUCH MATH!

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:23:43 UTC from web in context
  25. @celestiaforequestria IGNORE WHAT I JUST SAID! I mathed wrong. I forgot to change the f-stop, I was calculating at f4.0. Let's assume you have a 50mm lens that can be stopped down to f/18, and set your focus distance to 25ft, then things from 12.5 feet out will be in focus. f22 would you give you focus from 10 feet out to infinity with the focus distance at 20 feet, but you'd definitely need a long exposure, and seeing as the moon's luminous would lose all of it's detail. So if you want the moon to be in focus, and detailed, definitely going to need two exposures.

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:21:12 UTC from web in context
  26. @celestiaforequestria AGO

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:15:29 UTC from web in context
  27. @celestiaforequestria Well, if you're shooting at infinite focus, which you'd need for the moon, with a 50mm lens, the near focus would start at 100 feet out, so Luna wouldn't be very big. At something longer, like 150mm, the focus starts at about 1000 feet, which even less ideal than 100 feet. I'd keep a dark background, and do multiple exposures. Do a shot with Luna in focus, a shot with the moon in the background, then do that post processing thing you're always on about to mash 'em together into one shot.

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:11:24 UTC from web in context
  28. @celestiaforequestria "It's only cheatin' if ya get caught, kid." - Jesus, Mark 18:27

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:11:13 UTC from web in context
  29. @celestiaforequestria My dream last night was about some girl I knew when I was growing up. I think I might message her, see how she's doing.

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:07:43 UTC from web in context
  30. @celestiaforequestria Photoshop magic.

    Saturday, 20-Aug-11 22:05:18 UTC from web in context