Replies to orangeeliminator
-
@orangeeliminator yeppers! we've got a group of nearly 80 on facebook, we've had meets, we've had a dinner, we've gone out merch-hunting. come join up!
-
@extremelyextreme Hah, I went to the Ipswich one on Wednesday last week. They had Twilight's Balloon, Twilight and Fluttershy fashion ponies, and a LOT of the old ones (ugh). The best thing they had was Cheerliee's Schoolhouse, which I have asked for Hearth's Warming like a BAWS.
-
@extremelyextreme Good man! Or lady?
-
@extremelyextreme Tesco's, They got the early contract on them and that's where I got my Twilight from. Got the others off Amazon
-
That moment you realise your not the only brony in a tiny little town call Wokingham, Yes I'm talking to you @extremelyextreme :D
-
@extremelyextreme Oh man, they're doing the solid hair ponies? I won't have to get my brother to make custom hair then!
-
@extremelyextreme Reading. jesus christ. Hands, stop making typos
-
@extremelyextreme Rading toy r us, I didnt capitalise the r cos I am the dumb
-
@extremelyextreme 12 noon is the scheduled start
-
@extremelyextreme 12:00pm Midday
-
@extremelyextreme But, everypony wants Luna's flank! Even if he's a bear, not a pony!
-
@extremelyextreme Yes, we should build a boxing ring, and make them fight! We could say to celestia that the bear touched Luna's flank, and to the bear that Celestia stole his muffins.
-
@extremelyextreme Well I like Twilight Sparkle, because she's adorkable. Yeah, that's pretty much it.
-
@extremelyextreme Well, that's because she's a deity. She's in the throne because it is her divine right. That's how it should be :D
-
@extremelyextreme This has nothing to do with politics so far. None of what you said has confirmed anything about anything other than she's a built in Mary Sue. Let's talk about something else.
-
@extremelyextreme That is a terrible excuse.
-
@extremelyextreme Yes. Exaclty. I believe that if you cannot see what you're doing, you deserve your fate. The present is the result of the actions of the past. I'm talking about not letting them screw themselves. But, as @thatonepony said, we should stop talking here about this, no matter how entertaining it is.
-
@extremelyextreme You think they have the right to complain, when they were in that situation BECAUSE THEY WERE STUPID ENOUGH to listen to some guy and follow him? They deserve their fate. I don't say the guy who will beat me will be better than me. If he's worse, the guys who followed him will suffer the fate they deserve, being exploited.
-
@extremelyextreme If they beat me, and take the control, they will either handle the country right, or suffer and starve for their idiocy. I'm ok with either option. They would had proven me wrong in my ways, or proven me right in my reasoning about "they're all idiots who can't live for themselves" I don't have any problem with Gadaffi. And you should know, the same people who fighted to overthrow him, fighted years ago to make him rise to power. They suffered for being idiots.
-
@extremelyextreme I never said that I'm not going to fight them. That's not how it works. They need to beat me to take the throne, so, if they win, they have proven they're better than me in strategy and controlling the masses.
-
@nerthos Okay, for the sake of argument, let's say we create a computer who never fails, never crashes, and never makes a mistake. Let's also for the sake of argument say that we are somehow able to program everything you believe is right into this computer. Even if this were to happen, and it's laws were enforced regardless of who opposed it. YOU'RE BOTH STILL RIGHT. YOU have created a "working" system (this being in the sense that no one lives long enough to do anything about it) which cannot be proven wrong simply because you are taking what you think is the "lesser of two evils" by ignoring everyone else's way and making your way the right way by being the only way. At the same time @extremelyextreme is also right because he is saying that your system is similar to other systems. Your system is very much like other systems in the sense that it is being forced on them without giving them the choice to feel differently about it.
-
@extremelyextreme Oh, a PhD is not needed for that kind of things. It's just about facts. If someone proves more capable than me, I'll just be overthrown, that's a fact. Only the one with the greatest capabilities can mantain the throne.
-
@extremelyextreme No, I'll base it in the fact that I'm able to discern how to make things work, no matter if others like it or not.
-
@extremelyextreme oh okay, i'm just going to stay out of it.
-
@extremelyextreme I did it all my life. Be it IRL, WoW guilds, etc. My whole life works around honor.
-
@extremelyextreme I'm okay with this. It allows me to stand in the middle of the two of your sides and just watch for the most part.
-
@extremelyextreme I would check the police, so there will be no corrupt officers. Though, I'll only opress those who walk off the way of honor and the principles stated by it. So, putting it simple, you'll hate it only if you want to screw other people for personal benefit.
-
@nerthos @extremelyextreme You both realize this is pretty much one giant circle right? Corrupt Laws feed into Anarchy which leads into a single power taking control of the masses which becomes the law which becomes corrupt which turns into anarchy. THERE IS NO WINNER IN THIS DEBATE.
-
@extremelyextreme They don't work because they lack enforcement. Give me the control of the police force of one single country, and in five years, there will be no theft, murder, or drugs on the streets. The population will be reduced at least a 20% in the process, but I can live with that.
