Conversation
Notices
-
@cajunbrony23 Yeah.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 16:53:04 UTC from web-
@pegasisterforever Are you new? I haven't seen you around yet. ^-^
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 16:54:43 UTC from web -
@pegasisterforever Just a tip: there's a little green hooked-arrow looking button which will automatically type the @-name of the user you're replying to as well as preserve context so that users can read the flow of posts as a conversation.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 16:55:37 UTC from web -
@conventrix it looks like francis from left 4 dead. lol
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 16:57:35 UTC from web-
@wafers @conventrix I am disappoint. -_-
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:00:38 UTC from web-
@scribusstatham Tallahassee from Zombieland?
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:01:44 UTC from web-
@wafers @conventrix It's Jason Statham.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:02:41 UTC from web-
@scribusstatham I've heard his name. What is he in?
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:03:32 UTC from web-
@wafers "Crank," "Snatch," "Safe," "Blitz," some movies with more than one word in their title. . .
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:05:29 UTC from web-
@scribusstatham snatch = statham's best full-length feature film
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:06:16 UTC from web -
@scribusstatham "Safe" I've heard of. Never seen it though.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:06:29 UTC from web-
@wafers It just came out in the States this weekend, and is why I have changed my icon in tribute.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:07:42 UTC from web-
@scribusstatham Is it ony good?
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:08:18 UTC from web-
@rotation I'm not seeing it until Tuesday or Wednesday, unfortunately. Gotta wait for my buddy to be available.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:10:30 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
@scribusstatham IT'S JASON STATHAM'S BALLOON
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:03:47 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
@conventrix gasp!
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:05:10 UTC from web -
@conventrix I find that hard to swallow
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:05:33 UTC from web -
@conventrix I knew what you meant. Like if you'd said "I don't watch horror," or "sci-fi" or any other genre without the "movies" at the end; it still makes sense.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:06:19 UTC from web -
@conventrix Don't confuse poor acting with believability of context. The idea that characters are believably put in those situations often prevents specific audiences from connecting with the characters, their arc and motives etc. But don't discount said movies as a genre altogether. Example = The first Terminator movie, and John Carpenter's The Thing, both have great acting and the action is sweet.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:13:24 UTC from web -
@conventrix So you know that Highlander deserves the Best Movie of All Time Award
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:19:49 UTC from web -
@conventrix I was just joking. Lambert pulls a Steven Segall and rocks the accent boat back and forth mid-scenes
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:23:08 UTC from web -
@conventrix For me, Highlander is the ultimate epitome of wasted potential. The first movie was fun but with every attempt to cash in on the franchise they dig a deeper grave. They bring it back with the anime feature film but the saving grace of that film was the villain's surprising development and not the hero's.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:26:51 UTC from web -
@conventrix You must not enjoy a lot of story telling.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:33:29 UTC from web -
@conventrix Those are simply a format, and the format doesn't necessarily validate the substance or subject matter. Also, scifi, action and fantasy movies are perfectly natural in storytelling because we ran out of unique or creative relevant stories that could actually happen irl a long time ago. Anything told now that can happen irl is a regurgitation of something already written hundreds of years ago in most cases. It's the whole "yeah, he's guarded because of this specific thing that has been in 20 other stories before" kind of thing. I still think it's possible it's the context part in action which rustles your jimmies, and although it is more than obvious the cookie cut applies to many this is not the case for all.
Sunday, 29-Apr-12 17:43:32 UTC from web
-
