Conversation
Notices
-
Everyone knows the right way to find special someone's is to fall in love with friends. "Dating" is a waste of time
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:08:12 UTC from web-
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:09:52 UTC from web
-
@mrmattimation why? It's so much easier. The connection is already there.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:10:45 UTC from web-
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:13:50 UTC from web
-
@mrmattimation well yeah it would suck if they didn't reciprocate I've never had that problem though B)
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:16:09 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@rarity I'm actually doing that right now. Me and my GF were best friends ever since I came to her school. It isn't pointless, it's to be able to "stuff" and "things" and no one care.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:11:25 UTC from web -
@rarity My method so far has been finding appealing girls, building up a blurry friendship, and gradually turning it romantic.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:19:52 UTC from web-
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:21:03 UTC from web
-
@nerthos Heh, wow... You TRY to make it romantic?
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:21:22 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 If I find the girl appealing enough, yes. I'm pretty good at romantic stuff. Otherwise I keep it blurry to the point she doesn't have the slightest idea of wether I'm attracted to her or not. (Except for girls who already have a boyfriend, in that case I make it evident that our relationship is friends-only)
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:24:48 UTC from web-
@nerthos Wow, man-whore much?
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:26:00 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 Hahaha, no. Only one at a time, plus I'm too elitist to get interested in many women. Plus I'm chaste, because of outdate codes of morality and all that.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:27:04 UTC from web-
@nerthos Chaste? Wow. I guess I'm not really surprised, given your above-average moral code, but still.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:28:53 UTC from web-
@mrmattimation Until I decide a girl is good enough for that level of intimacy or something. For now it's not neccesary, and it's a great way to exercise self-control.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:31:05 UTC from web-
@nerthos Of course the word can vary in meaning depending on the beliefs of each person/religion, but for me it's no unnecessary sex.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:32:40 UTC from web-
@nerthos "unnecessary"... Would you mind explaining your reasoning to me? (I see chaste as just staying a virgin)
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:35:07 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 Sex just for the sake of sex, with no other point than pleasure.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:36:39 UTC from web-
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:37:52 UTC from web
-
@mrmattimation Well, if the people are together, I don't see why anyone should care..
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:38:53 UTC from web -
@mrmattimation I don't have an issue with others doing it, I just don't see a gain in it.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:39:27 UTC from web-
@nerthos Like SnowconeEnchilada said, if both parties are fully aware that it is simply casual, I don't see a problem with it.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:41:44 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@deadmadness665 Pursuing somebody romantically doesn't make you a whore.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:27:51 UTC from web-
@mrmattimation Well, when it's every appealing (female?) friend... Just messing with him though! http://ur1.ca/g83yr
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:32:23 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 Romantically appealing =/= "I'd hit that".
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:33:45 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@nerthos (Again, assertiveness = Feelings for assertive people) FACT. X3
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:29:02 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 Won't argue that. It's hard for me to stand people who lack conviction.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:34:51 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
@snowcone You and everyone here know that I'm very fond of the female figure.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:35:37 UTC from web -
@snowcone Exactly.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:39:49 UTC from web -
@snowcone Ooooo, to bad Clayton can't be a part of it... *Slight sob*
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:44:53 UTC from web -
@snowcone q t wave
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:44:59 UTC from web -
@snowcone I've thankfully managed to skip the mating mindset of puberty without breaking anything.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:46:31 UTC from web -
@sprite Ooooo, to bad Clayton can't be a part of it... *Slight sob* (Maybe you'll actualy reply. XP )
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:47:38 UTC from web -
@snowcone Yes, I'm a rough q t.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:47:55 UTC from web -
@snowcone Oh, thanks then. Maybe related to the process by which I managed that, I'm able to modify my sexual preferences, which is pretty funny because I can mess with people that say it's a thing people can't change.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:49:29 UTC from web-
@nerthos Well now I feel insulted to the fact that if you do do "stuff" you apparently don't have good self-control... Hmm...
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:52:36 UTC from web-
@deadmadness665 Never said that. Just that you have more if you're able not to.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:55:31 UTC from web
-
-
-
@snowcone Considering I've decided on heterosexuality and thus the mae body isn't appealing in the least to me, I'd say I'm not pansexual. Changing that would be really stupid for me though, since the only kind of sex that would serve me for anything would be sex with a fertile woman.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:54:06 UTC from web -
@snowcone If you accept that I have a "modular" psyche, you'll find it's not that hard for me to do that. If I can change my personality I can change other things too.
Friday, 20-Dec-13 03:59:09 UTC from web
-
