Cloud Kicker (critialcloudkicker)'s status on Monday, 03-Nov-14 18:47:12 UTC
-
@redenchilada @nerthos I guess I have come to see your point. 40 GB is quite hefty when the "average" for games comes areound 8GB by sheer force of numbers. ( footnote, I do not know who coined "8GB" nor is it important. But http://pny.lv/631e and http://pny.lv/631g do not seem to agree with that, regardless, not what the discussion was about ). I am however on the side of progression, not regression. People want better graphics, a better and longer story to thrill them, and while we are at it loads of different sights to behold. Some companies utilise this to make better and greater. I think that with this "growth" in requirements and offered incremental increases, the customer should grow with it. I am a firm believer that games like Watch_dogs ( 20 GB ) Titanfall ( 48 GB ) Destiny ( 40 (?) GB ) whom hopped console generation barriers are causing the games-industry to be held back. Yes you can mention that they are big, but you are probably part of the problem if you openly complain.
