Replies to tekkdan, page 26

  1. @tekkdan ...I guess not. Back when it was a feature in a userscript it showed up regardless of whether someone was logged in or not. Huh.

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 03:34:41 UTC from web in context
  2. @tekkdan But without nukes... No Fallout... :(

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 02:35:05 UTC from web in context
  3. @tekkdan Whoops meant to say deal* instead of deel.

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 02:34:41 UTC from web in context
  4. @tekkdan Oh snap, that 7 minute later reply, also what if your bad side is like, a whole other pony?

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 02:34:31 UTC from web in context
  5. @tekkdan For me if I could do a good thing that'll make someone else's life better whilst not making mine any worse, then I'd do it, but if it's doing a good thing for others and it'll end up me loosing something in the process, then that person best be like a close friend or they have done the same for me, but say I could do something that would make my life better at the expense of others, but I could do it with getting away with it, I would, but I wouldn't do anything to make someone else's life worse for no reason other than revenge or self gain, so what exactly would that be placed under?

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 02:31:56 UTC from web in context
  6. @tekkdan Oh, sounds cool!

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 02:18:57 UTC from web in context
  7. @tekkdan Oh man, I never played a Wario game ever, is it like Mario games just with a fat dude instead?

    Wednesday, 10-Oct-12 01:59:45 UTC from web in context
  8. @tekkdan i know it was an honest mistake

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 23:26:56 UTC from web in context
  9. @tekkdan A lot of people only post once every few days, if at all. :/ Not everyone uses it as a glorified chatroom like some of us, heh.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 22:59:44 UTC from web in context
  10. @tekkdan I actually got the base price back. The $0.01 I bought it for. I just didn't get the shipping back for some raisin

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 22:04:48 UTC from web in context
  11. @tekkdan @scribble :D

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 21:57:25 UTC from web in context
  12. @tekkdan Groups are literally no big deal, dude. Just make it, post to it occasionally, and if nobody's interested they just won't join.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 21:55:10 UTC from web in context
  13. @tekkdan Is it sad that Ponies have never been in my dreams only Slender Man?

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 21:05:01 UTC from web in context
  14. @tekkdan Granted, if you do it intentionally you'll incur the wrath of the staff and their trash can vision, but groups don't affect how the site works enough to cause any real problems.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 21:04:03 UTC from StatusNet Android in context
  15. @tekkdan the ups

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 20:59:31 UTC from web in context
  16. @tekkdan If you don't put anything in the first box you'll have a bugged group with no name that can't be accessed. It doesn't cause anything bad to happen, but a mod would have to come across it and remove it.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 20:57:29 UTC from StatusNet Android in context
  17. @tekkdan it dosnt really matter. you can make as many as you want at any time

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 20:54:06 UTC from web in context
  18. @tekkdan Just start one up and you can change it, edit it, start more, etc any time. Groups on here are just a way to categorize notices.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 20:53:54 UTC from StatusNet Android in context
  19. @tekkdan You can create as many groups as you want. Just make sure you fill the form out right. So many people forget to enter a group name and end up with an unusable, un-erasable group.

    Tuesday, 09-Oct-12 20:53:25 UTC from web in context
  20. @tekkdan It does~ :P

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 13:50:13 UTC from web in context
  21. @tekkdan i remember being with this shirt for one week or so

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 13:47:17 UTC from web in context
  22. @tekkdan they don't release it for the same reason they don't release mother 3 for gba in north america. The console is outdated.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 13:28:04 UTC from web in context
  23. @tekkdan i should beat rayman origins at once

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 13:18:46 UTC from web in context
  24. @tekkdan You can buy the EPROM for $35 but then you have to sacrifice a game with the FX chip and solder the new eprom into. Of course you can use an emulator but I think it is not the same even if you use a SNES controller adapter.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 13:12:15 UTC from Choqok in context
  25. @tekkdan It probably didn't achieve the sales needed for a sale. Glover is not a massively popular game, as you don't hear it that often online.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:59:52 UTC from web in context
  26. @tekkdan Because Glover isn't a military shooter which is barely distinguishable from its counterparts. People aren't interested in original games anymore.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:55:42 UTC from web in context
  27. @tekkdan It is also a shame that Starfox 2 never came out although the game was almost finished. There are some inofficial reproduction cartridges out there but they are very expensive.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:53:04 UTC from Choqok in context
  28. well im off tho work now btw @tekkdan i got a facebook account up and running basicly im using it for current and future con info. (furture con info will be loaded after i get my costume all put together lol) http://www.facebook.com/xvinylx.xscratchx

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:42:05 UTC from web
  29. @tekkdan I think it's one of those games that deserves it's criticism. The N64 version is much better imo, but it's all opinion.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:40:37 UTC from web in context
  30. @tekkdan Yeah! You can easily see that Glover is very similar to Mario 64. After beating Mario 64 it is the perfect subsitute.

    Sunday, 07-Oct-12 12:39:42 UTC from Choqok in context