Replies to tiff, page 2

  1. @tiff Pretty sure if my tweets ever take off, it'll either be Because or Why I am getting cancelled.

    Monday, 25-May-20 15:01:34 UTC from web in context
  2. sins of the poster

    Monday, 25-May-20 10:40:15 UTC from web in context
  3. @tiff same here but I never learned any lessons

    Monday, 20-Apr-20 20:11:28 UTC from web in context
  4. the venn diagram of mods throughout the site's history and the people who had to DM me to shut the papaya up is a circle

    Monday, 20-Apr-20 20:03:46 UTC from web in context
  5. @tiff same. I knew how the last episode was going to go but was disappointed nonetheless.

    Monday, 13-Apr-20 18:46:19 UTC from web in context
  6. @tiff kind of. If it ended before the last episode, definitely.

    Monday, 13-Apr-20 17:27:11 UTC from web in context
  7. @tiff I would make love to it and then destroy it anyway, to teach it a lesson in humility

    Monday, 30-Mar-20 00:26:10 UTC from web in context
  8. @tiff he announced today that he would stay in the race despite not having a viable way to the nomination (in 2016 he at least had a real shot until around May or June) so he himself may be perpetuating the meme

    Wednesday, 11-Mar-20 18:50:53 UTC from web in context
  9. @tiff I always preferred label-free, anyway. Twenty years ago, I was "hetero" because "I may only be attracted to the opposite sex, but I'm not misogynistic or homophobic like those STRAIGHTS over there..."

    Saturday, 22-Feb-20 16:32:19 UTC from web in context
  10. he says as if he doesn't walk around saying "I'M GAY" or some variation of every 5 seconds lol

    Saturday, 22-Feb-20 09:52:13 UTC from web in context
  11. @tiff I guess this makes sense. My pan/bi ex used them interchangeably because, in her own words, “bi” was easier for people to understand in casual conversation and “pan” was technically more correct, though she didn’t mind being called either.

    Friday, 21-Feb-20 23:43:42 UTC from web in context
  12. citation: me, who has dabbled in both terms and settled on just using "??!?"

    Friday, 21-Feb-20 17:08:18 UTC from web in context
  13. @tiff you’re being kind of an f-word right now dude...........

    Wednesday, 19-Feb-20 19:41:33 UTC from web in context
  14. @tiff hello alt-right

    Wednesday, 22-Jan-20 02:22:03 UTC from web in context
  15. @tiff https://youtu.be/72kr047-vlM w00t

    Tuesday, 21-Jan-20 22:27:36 UTC from web in context
  16. @tiff Are you endorsing Bob Dole, too?

    Tuesday, 21-Jan-20 21:01:31 UTC from web in context
  17. @tiff Which party though?

    Tuesday, 21-Jan-20 20:46:58 UTC from web in context
  18. @tiff @scribus thanks, admittedly I don’t 100% know what’s going to happen, it’s a friend I know through work and I found out about it through an announcement that was made to the management team about it. I don’t know how serious it is, if it’s treatable, etc. etc. Maybe I’m overreacting. Maybe this ends up being nothing after a round of chemo and a surgery. I hope that’s the case but I know almost nothing about it and I’m supposed to be pretend everything’s normal.

    Thursday, 09-Jan-20 23:20:15 UTC from web in context
  19. TOP 25 ALBUMS of 2019 https://twitter.com/Tiff_Spearman_/status/1208721718103158789 http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875399

    Sunday, 22-Dec-19 12:24:37 UTC from web in context
  20. TOP 15 EPs of 2019 https://twitter.com/Tiff_Spearman_/status/1208359492259323904 http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875395

    Saturday, 21-Dec-19 12:17:26 UTC from web in context
  21. HONOURABLE MENTIONS 2019 https://twitter.com/Tiff_Spearman_/status/1207997681974620161 http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875391

    Friday, 20-Dec-19 12:20:43 UTC from web in context
  22. @tiff centrism

    Saturday, 14-Dec-19 00:05:56 UTC from web in context
  23. @tiff But humans are Potato Knishesty victuals!

    Friday, 13-Dec-19 18:08:39 UTC from web in context
  24. @tiff ......... technically, this is true. Only to an extent though, obviously. In healthy individuals, the more insulin in the blood, the less bio reactive it is. In individuals with diabetes or insulin resistance, this happens sooner.

    Thursday, 12-Dec-19 22:22:28 UTC from web in context
  25. @tiff sorry but I am not taking the blame on something you thought I implied, that is on you. At least you would agree with me that the big bad boogeyman should have a name.

    As I have clearly demonstrated, I know not enough about this whole lingo thing to actually be confused when at one moment we are talking about LGBT and the next about LGBTQ and after that about LGBTQ+. Next up we are talking about the LGBTQQIP2SAA ( and no I did not make that acronym up )

    So yeah, I should deffinatly shut up right ? I might actually do more damage trying to understand what is what and say the wrong thing. It is not like you actually want to share ideas and thoughts and live in corcord or harmony with one another.

    Thursday, 12-Dec-19 19:04:22 UTC from web in context
  26. @tiff The diabetes comment is rather simple. If you want to put people down in the history books because they had a hard life because their self-termination statistics are too high then too must we apply this to people who have crippling diabetes but choose to continue to walk the path of the fast food. Which is the wrong way to approach getting into the history books.

    If you have a problem and can not handle it alone, seek out help. There are more than enough ways means and places to find it.

    All those people who died because they told themselves that they were too proud to seek out help, it breaks my heart.

    "But you do not take your own life because you are trans" ofcourse not, but there are way too many people who start to walk the walk unprepared and find themselves in between a rock and a hard place eventually where suicide starts to seem like an acceptable step. That goes for both trans people and diabetic people whom eat themselves to death, they need help.

    Thursday, 12-Dec-19 09:49:17 UTC from web in context
  27. @tiff LGBTQ Plus? Where did the plus suddenly come from? Regardless, if you think I am saying that their opression is insignificant because there is no KKK then you are just LOOKING for a problem without a name.

    History has shown us again and again that once there is a real problem it will receive a convenient name. How else are you going to talk about it ?

    There are MANY things punishable by death in some countries, that does not mean that any of it is ohkay. But the moment it alligns or opposes what you think or believe in is not the moment to talk about it. You can not solve it. I can only say that I agree or disagree.

    Violence is bad. That is my statement. Yet in the same breath you seem to be happy to send TERF's to the guillotine ? I am having a hard time to take any of that seriously, I guess I just have to choose you were joking. Do you think that looks well to the outside ? How is anyone to judge that ? I'll tell you what though, that is not tolerance. Ask Giovanni Gentile

    Thursday, 12-Dec-19 09:36:24 UTC from web in context
  28. @tiff how dare a language be versatile unlike some peoples’ closed minds.

    Thursday, 12-Dec-19 01:53:26 UTC from web in context
  29. @tiff

    > you didn't say sorry

    I am very sorry for deadnaming someone, it was wrong of me, and even though I did not know it was, I should not have done it. I have read up on it and it is a very very bad thing, especially in the USA. I will do my utmost best to never do it again. and I am also sorry that it got lost in the soup of rewriting.

    > you say trans people haven't had a hard history yet bring up suicide statistics.

    While terrible, there is not somehting like the KKK for LGBT people that I know of. or a targeted genocide. The terrible things that happen around LGBT places are usually carried by the media like they are huge things and how we should support the LGBT members that you know IRL.

    On the other hand, the way you use suicide statistics as a way of measuring history. Diabetes would like to get in on history. Which just does not sit right with me.

    > i assumed you knew

    I did hear that name before, but only on SouthPark, I thought it was a mockery. Again, my apologies.

    Wednesday, 11-Dec-19 23:51:57 UTC from web in context
  30. @tiff

    > i informed you of your mistake and you're going out of your way to not correct yourself.

    I said sorry and I said that I'll try better so I will not deadname anyone ever again.

    That somehow does not count ? Then what does ?

    > there's no esoteric quality to trans identity,

    Yet at the same time they have a tough history, somehow.

    > people are more than happy to tell you their pronouns if they don't make them known by default.

    Yet you just had to tell me that Caitlyn's pronoun is she.

    You see the disconnect here ?

    Wednesday, 11-Dec-19 23:36:25 UTC from web in context