ZacharyJ's home timeline
Notices
-
i also don't wear very thick glasses anymore, those are sitting in a drawer somewhere, i wear very thick contact lenses
Monday, 23-Sep-19 04:21:18 UTC from web -
And, of course, candidates matter. So once the Democrats have found themselves a nominee, it's possible - likely, even - that all of this data will become completely irrelevant before next November.
Monday, 23-Sep-19 04:13:15 UTC from web -
There are so many other things I could go into on the subject because I'm a kiwiing nerd who wears very thick glasses and looks at numbers all day but like, whatever
Monday, 23-Sep-19 04:08:14 UTC from web -
tl;dr facts don't care about your feelings libtards
Monday, 23-Sep-19 04:02:36 UTC from web -
Unsurprisingly, the map I just posted, which was calculated based on the 538 PVI and the 538 Congressional Generic Ballot, also correlates with Trump's net approval in each of those states. In a vacuum these things mean absolutely nothing, but adding them to a pile and analysing and cross-referencing them tells you a lot. http://rainbowdash.net/url/875209
Monday, 23-Sep-19 04:01:42 UTC from web-
@mrmattimation Yes and there are still 10 people running for democratic presidential candidate, and last time I checked the Republicans are going to run with the current president. Meaning there is one flavour of red and various flavours of blue. Of course one side is going to be a lot more outspoken about thier choice. Same thing happened in, lets see, 2012, 2004, 1996, 1984, for some reason in 1980 that was not a 2nd term runnin prez, 1972, and 1956.
As for those two maps, Well we already know the bias of "270 to win"Jonathan Chouinard likes this.
-
