Conversation

Notices

  1. cabal cabal

    The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

      @ponydude2143 it's not as bad as the tons of fetish porn and disgusting mangoes churned out daily by perverts claiming to be bronies.

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:11:02 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
    2. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

      @abigpony yeah, but do they really have to drag ponies into it?

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:14:51 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
      1. Michael Michael

        @quetzalcoatl It happens to anything and everything. While you don't have to stop hating it, it's a lot easier to just tolerate it and move on.

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:16:13 UTC from web
      2. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

        @quetzalcoatl Ir's the internet. Nothing is sacred. I'm just glad we keep it out of here and EqD as well as we do.

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:16:36 UTC from web
        1. Northern Dash Northern Dash

          @eaglehooves Don't tempt me to change that for the sake of changing that >_>

          Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:17:53 UTC from web
    3. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

      @abigpony rule 34 is wrong by nature and is no excuse for that mangoes. Honestly, the world needs to get up and start regulating the internet a bit tighter.

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:18:07 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
      1. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

        @quetzalcoatl That's a double edged sword. Not sure we all want to go down that path.

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:19:37 UTC from web
        1. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

          @eaglehooves but it's like, you wouldn't stroll around in public nude on the off chance that kids might see your dick, so why would you make a papayas ton of gross, exagerrated porn and tag it with terms that children are likely to search while online? Strict search doesn't work all the time.

          Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:22:18 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
          1. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

            @quetzalcoatl It doesn't always work, but it's better than nothing. The issue with regulating the internet is that it's enormous, international, and anonymous. While I'd love to see that stuff put somewhere I can easily ignore it, there's no real way to enforce it.

            Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:25:56 UTC from web
          2. Northern Dash Northern Dash

            @quetzalcoatl Nah, but you might stroll around nude simply because you can. There is nothing inherently immoral or evil about nudity.

            Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 04:17:49 UTC from web
      2. Michael Michael

        @quetzalcoatl The problem with regulating the internet is that it's very hard to do. At the same time if people were to regulate it, what's to say they wouldn't be able to abuse it's power and shut out things that are perfectly fine, yet they don't like? This is why it's far easier to let everyone regulate themselves and decide what they look for and don't look for.

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:22:08 UTC from web
    4. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

      @abigpony improbable, but not impossible. China and Australia already do it.

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:23:41 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
    5. Yuuki Aosora Yuuki Aosora

      @abigpony @quetzalcoatl Mom always did say, if your going to do something. . . Do it Hardcore >:D. I think that applies with everything :3

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:28:13 UTC from web
    6. Michael Michael

      @princesstwilight I resent that! I sit on my chair and watch my computer while scratching my head. =P

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:29:47 UTC from web
    7. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

      @quetzalcoatl I still don't trust the government to decide what's best for me, and not abuse the power. The internet produces a lot of mangoes, but there's a lot of good stuff that wouldn't happen without the anonymity too.

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:39:37 UTC from web
      1. Michael Michael

        @eaglehooves *In Pinkie Pie's voice* "Hey! That's what I just said!"

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:41:28 UTC from web
        1. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

          @fallinwinter *Sunglasses* Deal with it.

          Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:42:05 UTC from web
          1. Michael Michael

            @eaglehooves I'll look down at you and say *Sunglasses* No. "Yeeeaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!"

            Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:43:17 UTC from web
            1. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

              @fallinwinter If we're both wearing sunglasses, then somepony might need to *Puts on sunglasses over sunglasses* shine some light on this argument. ~yyyyyyyyyyyyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!

              Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:50:37 UTC from web
      2. Eat me, I ain't telling you. Eat me, I ain't telling you.

        @eaglehooves hmph, when you put it that way... But I still can't help but feel like there's gotta be a way for them to only attack issues that actually cause problems for a majority of people.

        Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:47:41 UTC from StatusNet iPhone
        1. Sir E. Hooves III Sir E. Hooves III

          @quetzalcoatl It all comes back to the issue of the minority being protected, even if they are idiots.

          Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:51:29 UTC from web
        2. Michael Michael

          @quetzalcoatl What about the minority who have interests that aren't a problem but are seen that way to the majority and are blocked from things that are unfairly taken away from them?

          Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:53:18 UTC from web
    8. Michael Michael

      @princesstwilight No, we must go DERPER!!!!

      Wednesday, 12-Oct-11 03:58:32 UTC from web