Conversation

Notices

  1. !hugs all around

    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:23:41 UTC from web
    1. @shori You must join the !hugs group! Stat!

      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:24:47 UTC from web
      1. @flaxx There's no more !hugs. Now it's #

        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:25:12 UTC from web
        1. @nerthos What!? What is this blasphemy? No more hug group! D:

          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:26:46 UTC from web
          1. @flaxx It was moonprincess' group cleaning, like two days ago.

            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:28:13 UTC from web
            1. @nerthos But... why?

              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:28:56 UTC from web
              1. @flaxx Useless groups, that can be replaced by hashtags. Cabal wanted to do a cleaning, and moonprincess wasn't in a good mood. So half of the groups got murdered.

                Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:31:52 UTC from web
                1. @nerthos And nothing of value was lost.

                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:33:08 UTC from web
                  1. @colfax The !Stabs group seems pretty useless. Just throwing it out there.

                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:33:49 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                    1. @ceruleanspark What !stabs group? ;)

                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:34:27 UTC from web
                      1. @colfax ILU

                        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:34:51 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                2. @nerthos In the staff's defense, the groups tab is horribly misused.

                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:33:24 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                3. @nerthos Ah, alright. Oh well. Guess it's no big deal.

                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:34:26 UTC from web
                  1. @flaxx @ceruleanspark @colfax Yeah, i'm not complaining about it. The !hugs one freaked the soul out of me.

                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:36:19 UTC from web
                    1. @nerthos There's quite a few I'd like to remove.

                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:37:15 UTC from web
                      1. @colfax Like wich ones?

                        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:38:11 UTC from web
                        1. @nerthos Like all the broken ones with no names because someone didn't know how to make a group, all the carcino groups, and a few others I can't recall easily because I'm not entirely awake yet.

                          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:41:24 UTC from web
                          1. @colfax I think the broken ones were redenchilada's fault, playing with kanji xD the carcino ones are funny and have a purpose

                            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:42:47 UTC from web
                            1. @nerthos No, they don't. And all the broken ones aren't all redenchilada's fault unless he's offering cheap payday loans on the side.

                              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:43:59 UTC from web
                              1. @colfax Broken spam groups? Lol, they fail at failing. At least, the !carcinoformod one has a purpose. And one of them is mine, the !carcinoismessiah one.

                                Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:45:32 UTC from web
                                1. @nerthos Other than wasting database space they serve no purpose.

                                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:46:38 UTC from web
                                  1. @colfax Perhaps the same could be said of every single group.

                                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:48:15 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                                    1. @ceruleanspark Not really, at least some of them are related to ponies in some fashion.

                                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:49:50 UTC from web
                                      1. @colfax I think the only groups we should keep should either be the ones concerned with site organisation (Something like !mods and !admins) and ones for meetups. none of the others are really...for anything.

                                        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:51:02 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                                        1. @ceruleanspark I'd also like to see it set up so you have to be a member for a certain length of time before you can create groups.

                                          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:55:07 UTC from web
                                          1. @colfax If you set it to two weeks or something like that, no more spam groups.

                                            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:56:52 UTC from web
                                            1. @nerthos Eeyup, that's the whole idea.

                                              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:58:07 UTC from web
                                              1. @colfax Talk with cabal about it, i think nopony will oppose to that idea.

                                                Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:58:43 UTC from web
                                                1. @nerthos No point, they're always "too busy" to bother with anything like that.

                                                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 14:00:11 UTC from web
                                                  1. @colfax Well, a shame. It was a great idea that would make shortwork of the spam. Another thing that would help is a wordfilter for links with the word "loan"

                                                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 14:02:30 UTC from web
                                    2. @ceruleanspark !posey is not useless!

                                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:51:07 UTC from web
                                  2. @colfax But carcino should be a mod. He does great things for the community, like scaring foreign trolls until they leave, like that time with the flankbook one who posted "dole" lots of times.

                                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:48:32 UTC from web
                                    1. @nerthos I remain unconvinced.

                                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:49:05 UTC from web
                                  3. @colfax Still, the only really useful ones are the meetup ones and !blamepurpletinker, because it's all purpletinker's fault.

                                    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:49:30 UTC from web
                    2. @nerthos What's wrong with hugs? :/ But yeah, I'm not complaining either.

                      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:40:52 UTC from web
                      1. @flaxx It's just that a group for the sole reason of posting the word "hugs" is useless. You can just use a # instead of !

                        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:43:47 UTC from web
                        1. @nerthos Pretty much, yeah.

                          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:57:31 UTC from web
                          1. @flaxx @nerthos @colfax Lovely idea, you ponies. ^^

                            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:58:30 UTC from web
                            1. @jinny hello muffin

                              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:59:07 UTC from web
      2. @flaxx Which hugs group? I thought I was already in one.

        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:25:56 UTC from web
        1. @shori I thought I was in it too! D:

          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:26:53 UTC from web
          1. @flaxx Oh well, we've still got the hashtag. #

            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:31:06 UTC from web
            1. @shori I guess. #

              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 13:33:40 UTC from web