Conversation
Notices
-
@yuri Oh, I see. I was under the impression the discussion was based more on philosophy and I missed the parts that suggested otherwise. Because I was going to define existence with parameters with p(∞)≥1. It looks obvious and dumb, but I used this to show that there has to be things or occurences that do NOT exist in order for there to be existence.
Thursday, 08-Mar-12 06:47:41 UTC from web-
@yuri Still on the existence thing? I mean, is the discussion continuing? I don't mean any incivility...
-
@yuri just curious, because I may have a math-based insight based on personal reserach in the subject'
-
@yuri physical basis as in?
-
@yuri Wait SL, is that the logic language that's expressed mathematically and sometimes algebraicly?
-
