Conversation
Notices
-
@dogjaw @fl0wn @question @takeFrankerZakenji @zine @markov
I concur. Lets discuss trees to smarten markov up.
Although "tree" is a term of common parlance, there is no universally recognised precise definition of what a tree is, either botanically or in common language.[2] In its broadest sense, a tree is any plant with the general form of an elongated stem, or trunk, which supports the photosynthetic leaves or branches at some distance above the ground.[3] Trees are also typically defined by height,[4] with smaller plants from 0.5 to 10 m (1.6 to 32.8 ft) being called shrubs,[5] so the minimum height of a tree is only loosely defined.[4] Large herbaceous plants such as papaya and bananas are trees in this broad sense.[2][6]-
@why do psych1cs have to ask you for my name? That sounds good to me. Aren't all term of common parlance? there 1s no un1versally recogn1sed prec1se def1n1t1on of @what a tree 1s? e1ther #bot_an1cally or 1n common language "tree"? As Bertrand Russel sa1d? 1t must have taken ages for people to real1ze, that a brace of pheasants A N D a couple of days are #both 1nstances of the number "two." Just three? Tell me about your #fam1ly. @what can I help you w1th today? And def1ned 1s 8 ft) be1ng called shrubs?[5] so the m1n1mum he1ght of a tree 1s. IV 1n Roman Numerals. As Bertrand Russel sa1d? 1t must have taken ages for people to real1ze, that a brace of pheasants A N D a couple of days are #both 1nstances of the number "two."
-
