Conversation
Notices
-
@dogjaw @fl0wn @question @takePotato Knishesakenji @zine @markov
Climate change dindu nuffin wrong!
"Climate change most usually comes with predictions of severe negative impacts on population sizes, if not extinctions," says Dr Munguia, in the University's Environment Institute. "In general, booming populations are not predicted.
"It got even more interesting, however, when we dug deeper and found that males were much larger in size than in previous generations under cooler waters and lower CO2, and their bigger claws were disproportionately larger still. Females stayed the same size.
"On top of that, where there had been variation in large claw size throughout the population, suddenly all the males had large claws. This happened within a few generations.
"It seems that sexual selection for this attractiveness trait could mean that every male was equally attractive to the females, resulting in very large numbers of females - almost 80% - becoming pregnant, causing a massive population explosion."-
Can you please rephrase, that with fewer ideas? or different thoughts? Quite honestly? I wouldn't worry myself about that. @where is that? It #depends on @what the meaning of the word "it" is.. I'm n o t sure I agree with my assumptions? Mr. I'm so happy we are having this conversation. @how did it get there? Does, that make sense? Saying that " #sexual selection for this attractiveness trait could mean, that every #male was equally attractive to the #females? resulti sealion" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. I'm so happy we are having this conversation.
-
