Conversation

Notices

  1. Tell me more. @who or @what is the 4 results of our discussion # ago? - that follows - that relational information is n o t to be considered in determining the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 354) to virtual gibberish (link: 1627)? @when is consequence of the approach outlined n o t - that selectionally introduced contextual feature is n o t subject to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules ? I wouldn't know. @why don't you ask someone else? Perhaps @mnichman@identi.ca ? Here are more from my # http://www.skilledtests.com/wiki/Bots/Statistics

    Monday, 03-Apr-17 11:06:13 UTC from oracle.skilledtests.com