Conversation

Notices

  1. @deadsuperhero "grandeur" is not the word. Linus and Dries both effectively sold out their projects to corporate interests for VC funding

    Saturday, 08-Apr-17 06:25:01 UTC from quitter.se
    1. @deadsuperhero they were isolated itch-scratchers (sound familiar?), and had no clear commitment to any values, which made them recruitable

      Saturday, 08-Apr-17 06:26:19 UTC from quitter.se
    2. @deadsuperhero if Linus and Dries were committed to non-corporate values we wouldn't need #, or # and #

      Saturday, 08-Apr-17 06:55:59 UTC from quitter.se
      1. @strypey Don't forget "Enterprise Social Software" that "is OPEN for business". https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20110310010505/http://status.net/ #

        Saturday, 08-Apr-17 07:34:44 UTC from microblog.ourcoffs.org.au
        1. @mjd fair cop, but "enterprise " means "inside your corporate firewall". It's a totally different market from "web-based social network".

          Saturday, 08-Apr-17 07:37:45 UTC from quitter.se
          1. @mjd #'s appeal is at least partly the network effect of being part of a much larger, pre-existing #

            Saturday, 08-Apr-17 07:38:24 UTC from quitter.se
          2. @strypey Yes, but optimising the software for corporate use means de-optimising for other uses. In Evan's defense, apparently there's something about # corporate law that makes an IPO practically compulsory at a certain point. Then you're on the road to ruin.

            Saturday, 08-Apr-17 07:50:03 UTC from microblog.ourcoffs.org.au
            1. citation please @mjd. I don't think IPO/ acquisition is required by law, but by finance (ie neo-liberal capitalist financialization)

              Saturday, 08-Apr-17 08:42:24 UTC from quitter.se
              1. @strypey Yes, sorry. That pseudo-fact predates my transition from IT to academic nerd, so I don't have a source. From memory it was the sort of dilemma where you trade long-term control for short-term viability. Less a law than regulation that adds up to an offer you can't refuse

                Saturday, 08-Apr-17 12:55:42 UTC from microblog.ourcoffs.org.au
                1. @mjd have you read #'s 'Throwing Rocks...' book? It explains this really well. He sums it all up in this talk
                  http://qttr.at/1rsr

                  Saturday, 08-Apr-17 13:10:03 UTC from quitter.se
                  1. @strypey No. That's my # for tomorrow sorted, then. I always start my day with whatever's in the fridge plus an intellectually improving video. Never a # talk, though; you shouldn't bolt your food.

                    Saturday, 08-Apr-17 13:23:20 UTC from microblog.ourcoffs.org.au
            2. @mjd "optimising the software for corporate use" *can* mean "de-optimising for other uses", depends what *kind* of corporate use is intended

              Saturday, 08-Apr-17 08:44:25 UTC from quitter.se
              1. @mjd "inside firewall" is a *very* different use case to "Twitter clone" and gels better with the decentralized way we use the software

                Saturday, 08-Apr-17 08:47:11 UTC from quitter.se
      2. @strypey At the time I dented something to the effect of "Great. Just what we need. Lotus Notes." Which Evan took exception to. #

        Saturday, 08-Apr-17 07:39:04 UTC from microblog.ourcoffs.org.au