Conversation

Notices

  1. @bob @gargron I agree. Having only web clients implicitly assumes that everyone will run their own server. That's ambitious but naive

    Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:15:59 UTC from quitter.se
    1. @gargron @bob what's more likely, as D* found out, is that trusted admins will run 'pods' for their family/ collective/ business etc.

      Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:17:36 UTC from quitter.se
      1. @gargron @bob having easy-to-learn web clients is good for adoption, and casual use, they're an essential part of growing the #

        Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:21:57 UTC from quitter.se
        1. @gargron @bob it's low-hanging fruit because it uses a universal UI (web standards) and avoids the headaches of cross-platform development

          Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:23:02 UTC from quitter.se
          1. @gargron @bob but I think client-side apps are better for power users. They can do more, without stressing out the web browser with scripts

            Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:24:25 UTC from quitter.se
            1. @gargron @bob although client-side apps that use HTML/ CSS for UI development could reduce cross-platform pain
              http://qttr.at/1rwn

              Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:58:37 UTC from quitter.se
              1. @gargron @bob an equivalent to # # covering all the major desktop/ laptop OS platforms (ideally all of them) would rock too

                Sunday, 09-Apr-17 13:00:46 UTC from quitter.se
        2. @strypey @gargron yes I agree. This is why I like !Pleroma. There's not much too it, and you can bling it up with custom themes and backgrounds.

          Sunday, 09-Apr-17 12:24:26 UTC from social.freedombone.net