Conversation
Notices
-
If the world wars never happened, what would our population do to this world?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:25:13 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen over 9000!
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:25:41 UTC from web -
@renovatedkitchen Dance parties.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:27:01 UTC from web -
@renovatedkitchen many small wars.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:27:12 UTC from web -
@greydragon412 Exactly. Im thinking that every so many years we either have wars, or some terrible desiese breaks out and wipes out a large portion of our population
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:27:17 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen I'm a pacifist.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:28:51 UTC from web-
@neighvana665 without things like wars and such, our planet would be over populated and we would all die
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:30:24 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen So it was OK for boys in highschool to be sent to Vietnam against their will?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:34:42 UTC from web-
@neighvana665 >Completely unrelated
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:35:37 UTC from web -
@neighvana665 Because people died in war, we are alive
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:36:04 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen Wanting to fight in a war is one thing but, forcing others against their will is just wrong. Sadly war is part of human nature.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:38:00 UTC from web-
@neighvana665 Its part of human nature because we make it that
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:38:35 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen Human nature? It's amazing what crap was called "human nature". And even if it is "human nature" - the big point of evolution is that the "nature" of a species will change eventually to adapt to the enviroment.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:40:46 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
@renovatedkitchen Or we could just give birth to less children. Don't encourage people to get children and do your best to make Condoms cheap and they don't overpopulate. Especially the warridden countries have the problem of too many children because the population reacts on the hostile enviroment by raising reproduction - and our gouvermnts and certain religions try to enforce that as well.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:36:11 UTC from web-
@hakupony i support not having children
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:36:45 UTC from web -
@hakupony But everyone is different. Personally, I want at least 2 kids, up to 3
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:37:33 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen @mushi My point is that you can have children if you really want to - and you should be very aware of the responsibilities and changes in your lifestyle that means. If you take parenthood seriously, then many people don't want that - and that's perfectly fine.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:39:09 UTC from web-
@hakupony Makes sense. Ive actually wanted kids since I was little. Im like the opposite of your usual guys personality.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:40:10 UTC from web -
@hakupony that is it, i really dont want to, so i will not.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:40:42 UTC from web
-
-
-
@hakupony One child per couple, half the population in two generations.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:41:30 UTC from web-
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:41:46 UTC from web
-
@purplephish20 @nerthos Thats like what they did in China. Didnt stop people from having kids. They had them, then set their extras on the street.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:42:59 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen thats because china have a f****d up honour viewpoint regarding the need to have male children
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:44:10 UTC from web-
@purplephish20 So, whats going to stop that from happening everywhere else?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:45:48 UTC from web-
@renovatedkitchen It doesnt... it's a pathetic world we live in
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:46:09 UTC from web
-
-
-
@renovatedkitchen The problem there is the parents, not the goverrnment. They don't understand nor care for the reasons of that law.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:46:00 UTC from web
-
-
@purplephish20 It's not difficult. And it ensures the good raising of those kids, since the parents would have enough time for that one kid, and money to feed it.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:44:04 UTC from web-
@nerthos No, because many people are idiots. In many countries, the girls would get killed because the parents wanted a boy.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:45:12 UTC from web-
@hakupony Let's be totally blunt and honest here. That's totally better than wars, depletion of resources, and eventually the whole species having to survive on a wasteland. No matter how bad it sounds.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:47:56 UTC from web-
@nerthos Are you aware of the prisoner dilemma?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:51:17 UTC from web-
@hakupony By name, I can't remember it. Still, I preffer some restrictions than death.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:53:54 UTC from web-
@nerthos It's from game theory. I'll just make up an experiment about it. You have two people who don't know nor see each other. Everyone of the both has a button. If none of them hit the button in an hour, everyone gets 5 dollars. If only one hits the button, he gets 7 dollars, if only the other one hits the button, he gets nothing, if both hit the button, everyone gets 3 dollars.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:58:06 UTC from web -
@nerthos The point is that you, as a state have an advantage if you don't enforce that law and the others do.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:59:09 UTC from web-
@hakupony I get your point. Yet not enforcing that law is counting on fate for the survival of the world.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 01:00:38 UTC from web-
@nerthos Nah, you just need other ways :-)
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 01:04:25 UTC from web-
@hakupony Free vasectomy?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 01:04:54 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@greydragon412 Or we should populate Mars
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:32:04 UTC from web -
@greydragon412 Useless like those who live off welfare, wont go find a job and cause violence and rob people?
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:34:16 UTC from web -
@renovatedkitchen We would now live in a depleted world with strict procreation laws. Laws should start now to avoid it happening anyway.
Wednesday, 01-Aug-12 00:34:58 UTC from web
-
