Conversation
Notices
-
Are there any disadvantages in Emarald if you have a female Pokémon, I know it does in gen 2
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:19:10 UTC from web-
@pokestrike There's never been a disadvantage unless you consider more chances to be hit by attract.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:20:44 UTC from web-
@flamingpandaomg Actually, in gen 2, female Pokémon had a lower attack stat
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:22:14 UTC from web-
@pokestrike you show me where there's any proof of that.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:22:52 UTC from web-
@flamingpandaomg I'd do it my self but I think the battery is dead on gold
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:25:11 UTC from web-
@pokestrike regardless that's not applying to you since you're playing a Gen 3 game.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:25:49 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@flamingpandaomg Actually in Gen 2, being female meant that you had more stats. the way they decided the gender of a Pokemon was based on their stats, so lets say that a pokemon has a 90% chance to be male, and 10% chance to be female. only the worst 10% of that Pokemon will be female.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:22:34 UTC from web-
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:23:01 UTC from web
-
@rarity That makes no sense but if multiple people are saying the same thing, who am I to disagree
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:25:16 UTC from web-
@flamingpandaomg that's just how they decided to calculate gender is all.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:27:02 UTC from web-
@rarity yeah I guess I wasn't old enough when Gen 2 came out to really care besides that I could breed.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:27:57 UTC from web-
@flamingpandaomg I only know because I watch speedruns of Gold
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:28:34 UTC from web -
@flamingpandaomg I wasn't born at the time gen 2 was out, well not in America that is, I got gold as a hand-me-down
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:29:22 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@rarity so really, it's not that because they're female, they have bad stats, it's that if they have bad stats, they are female.
Thursday, 17-Oct-13 04:25:26 UTC from web
-
-
-
