Conversation

Notices

  1. If police can put people in protective custody for their own good, can mods put users in a "protective ban"?

    Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:05:01 UTC from web
    1. @scribus I promise I wont feed the fire any longer.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:06:09 UTC from web
      1. @zeldatra I didn't name any names.

        Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:06:47 UTC from web
        1. @scribus I'm under the assumption that I may be part of the problem.

          Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:09:07 UTC from web
      2. @zeldatra http://i.imgur.com/IWtn15D.jpg

        Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:09:14 UTC from web
    2. @scribus The internet should have age restrictions ~

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:06:18 UTC from web
    3. @scribus You can try but then they get all whiny and make alt accounts to get around it and wind up perma-banned.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:06:47 UTC from web
      1. @colfax Fie. :C

        Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:07:08 UTC from web
    4. @widget Making alts to get around a silencing gets them all banned.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:08:46 UTC from web
    5. @widget You must be reading a different one then.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:11:18 UTC from web
    6. @widget Doesn't make it any less true.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:13:13 UTC from web
    7. @widget If it's wrong there should be no difficulty finding facts to prove it, no?

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:21:06 UTC from web
    8. @widget Truth is a math thing. I thought we were talking about science here.

      Wednesday, 30-Jan-13 01:22:12 UTC from web