Notices by RDN's Lucifer (nerthos), page 40

  1. @shpuld Comfy pink blob

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 23:59:24 UTC from web in context
  2. @somercet This is adorable

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 23:17:25 UTC from web in context
  3. @shpuld @roka Who will build the skyroads

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 23:12:24 UTC from web in context
  4. @mushi About a month old now, right?

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 23:11:02 UTC from web in context
  5. @sim Tribalism.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:45:36 UTC from web in context
  6. @sim Only "brave" when having the advantage.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:43:49 UTC from web in context
  7. @sim Yeah, it's funny. Old ladies and all that think people go crazy at those places but despite the loud music they're some of the safest places to be in. If someone falls in the mosh pit people will give them space to get up, if anyone tries to steal or attack someone the whole crowd will try to hit them. It's great. As for these guys, yeah, but an one sided fight. They're quick to retreat if having to fight on even grounds.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:38:21 UTC from web in context
  8. and this is where everything starts to go downhill ...

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:25:16 UTC from gs.kawa-kun.com Repeat of markov
  9. @sim Regarding thugs, the same should be done about them as it's done about thieves in heavy metal concerts: the crowd turns on them when they try to do their thing, and beat them up to then resume doing what they were doing in the first place.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:23:15 UTC from web in context
  10. @mushi I used to play a lot of mame as a kid

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:21:49 UTC from web in context
  11. @mushi I never beat that one because it'd throw an error in the dojo stage after beating the boss

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:18:52 UTC from web in context
  12. @sim And in those cases yeah, it should be done, but they're not needed in the western world. As for wearing stuff that cover your face casually, that's fine, I only see an issue with it in public events.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:16:10 UTC from web in context
  13. @archaeme Forwarded it to @ceruleanspark in case it's just the server's date and time lagging behind a bit.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:10:46 UTC from web in context
  14. @sim Not to mention it's really fun to do.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:01:28 UTC from web in context
  15. @sim If it were necessary, sure, but generally if you're protesting for a good cause there's no need for it, as being identified isn't a bad thing. Say you're protesting for tighter regulations in mining after an environmental disaster, to give an example: why would you want to hide your identity if the cause you're championing is objectively good?

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 22:00:37 UTC from web in context
  16. @cyberpotato Honestly it depends on what bike.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:57:58 UTC from web in context
  17. @sim This is how classical fascism is born, and why people support it. It's either that or living in no man's land.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:24:01 UTC from web in context
  18. @maiyannah @sim @flownsclone Face coverings should be illegal period.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:21:07 UTC from web in context
  19. @maiyannah They need those TVs to see the White Man oppress them

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:19:44 UTC from web in context
  20. @sim Anifa is a really funny name though as they're closer to the armed branches of fascist parties than to anything else.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:19:14 UTC from web in context
  21. @sim You're not an idiot though. You bother learning, spend a lot of time reading about history, talk with people with different ideas. That doesn't apply to a significan portion of humanity.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:17:01 UTC from web in context
  22. @sim They're too dumb to see this though. People will rather give up a few rights to a government that'll stop these criminals than keep them and have their workplaces burned down. I certainly would trade the right to protest without a permit for an armed response to these riots by the state if I were there.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:15:59 UTC from web in context
  23. @sim It isn't really anarchy, it's partisan terrorism. If they were actual anarchists they wouldn't be fighting a particular candidate and defending another government.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:09:58 UTC from web in context
  24. @sim Yeah, they're a political "strong arm" that exists to cause riots and destabilize the place so that their backers can claim that the population isn't happy and are protesting, to then get footage of this, air it, and claim the situation is as it's shown because of the current political party is in power. If power shifts to the backer's party, they call off the paid rioters. It's a really old tactic to get uninformed people to think something's bad, playing into mob instinct by placing agitators that encourage others to join or feel unsafe.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 21:03:49 UTC from web in context
  25. @sim They've never "protested", they only chimped out for money.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:58:16 UTC from web in context
  26. @sim @nerthos Antifa basically IS thuggery.  Thuggery is the purpose it exists.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:58:44 UTC from community.highlandarrow.com in context Repeat of maiyannah
  27. @sim Stickman's some guy who beat up one of those thugs with a stick. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/based-stickman

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:57:09 UTC from web in context
  28. @sim Well anyone who identifies as "antifa" is a subhuman thug, so don't expect anything more complex than tribal brutality from them. Then again as proven by based stickman, they aren't all that dangerous if you're prepared to defend yourself.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:49:37 UTC from web in context
  29. @roka Oh, I understood it the other way around from your wording.

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:47:31 UTC from web in context
  30. @critialcloudkicker That's premium quality trolling

    Sunday, 12-Mar-17 20:44:03 UTC from web in context