Replies to commodore, page 64
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese hey, happy first day of spring :3
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Lbh ner n gebyy:3
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese I must say it must be a bother to type that in every once in a while
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Bu, lbh qba'g fnl?
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese you have the longest name ever....
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese @doates Ohg V npghnyyl.. V xvaqn yvxr guvf ehzbe.. :/
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Tbbq Zna. Abj nyy lbh unir gb qb vf trg hc tb gb lbhe qbbe. Abj, vs gur qbbe vf oruvaq lbh, whfg jnyx onpxjneqf. Gur Zbyrfgvn jvyy abg nggnpx hagvy lbh ghea nebhaq. Bcra gur qbbe, fybjyl naq jnyx bhg. Fynz gur qbbe naq ybpx vg. Gel gb svaq n jnl gb gur sebag qbbe jvgubhg gheavat nebhaq. Gura trg bhg naq eha yvxr uryy. Tbbq yhpx. OJNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNU! :GEBYYSNPR:
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese That's good c:
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Pretty awesome, how about you.? :D
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese My thoughts exactly. Holy fruit thats a long name.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese not. At. ALL. Linux wins.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese i drew cavatina's princess hugs' minti's shadow light's pinhooves' scribbs' and forestrain's .
-
@aeniug2 @commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese @toksyuryel So without any real prrof that I "was" or "will be" I'm only left with my perception of the present, that I "am."
-
@aeniug2 @commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese @toksyuryel so where was I? Um.. I guess you could say there is no 'next' moment or 'previous' moment. There's just our perception of any given moment as it relates to us, and that moment may be infinitely long or short.. For whatever purpose, we can only perceive one moment at a time (what's known as the present), and our perception of that moment happens to take place on what we perceive as a timeline. We're wise to consider our perception flawed however because experience tells us that, where there are gaps, our minds fill in the blanks and try to make sense of what is or isn't. It is because of flawed perception that I opened my mind to the possibility that time doesn't exist, and, when I delved further into introspection I found that, while I possess memories, I have no guarantee that my memories are real, and, while I have expectations for the future, I have no guarantee that they are real either.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese How did you read my mind? It's 4:22 here and these crazy ponies on the interweb are talking about the theory of relativity and other stuff.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Sure, just let me get these cleats on and soaked in acid.
-
Pony
Aeniug2
, Commodore
, Crusader 8
, toksyuryel
@aeniug2 @commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese @crusader8 @toksyuryel I think, scientifically, the theory of relativity begins to scratch the surface, but (in terms of we all understand) essentially my notions don't mean much to science, at least not now. I feel there will come a time (or in other words, the state of mankind may be) that our scientific notions align accurately with the true nature of time, change, and existence. To clairy, let me give an example. According to my theory, tomorrow and yesterday both exist now. We perceive the past as passed and the future as not yet come because we're focused on a singular facet of our existence which we perceive as the present. Ack! my computer is majorly derping right now.. lemme restart my browser...
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese Your name makes me want to kick a puppy.
-
so @pony you prefer to think time doesn't exist because of the variable scales in which it can be scrutinized (which ultimately is just an argument of measurement nomenclature when certain converted denominations seem less significant) and @commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese you offer time branches out, although that line of thinking isn't compatible to the nature of time measuring when matter was like so and now it's like that. I think when both of you think of time you're thinking of clocks, repeating periods and annuals. The record of time is not time itself. If we didn't record time (aka historical documentation) there wouldn't be a lot of the ideas and theories of time which border more on the philosophical.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese 'current moment' is just a term I use to describe existence. There is no "was" or "will be." There simply "is."
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese @crusader8 in any case there's something to be said for the perception of time, whether or not it exists. It is important to us, but I feel it's important also to understand the limitations of seeing the universe as strictly defined by the passage of time and change.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese oh I see. That way of looking at time brings up the quandary of how we're able to both exist and progress at all though. If time may be said to be divisible into infinitesimal units then, given any finite number of those units, they invariably add up to nothing so it might be hypothesized that, if time existed in such a manner, then we'd never move forward in our existence. One way to reconcile that with the fact that we do appear to move forward may be to assume that, for any given (infinitesimal) unit of time, we exist for an infinitely long period of time so that the effect of moving forward can actually occur. But that seems over-complicated to me, so I prefer to think of time as not existing at all.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese on second thought, if I see time as choices creating branches, then that would call for at least two timelines that could be considered alpha.
-
@commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese hmmmmmm indeed....
