Conversation
Notices
-
@cptscoot @ramiel No, see. Rarity doesn't do "sexy". It's not her M.O., not her game. She's a lady, not some random mule off the street. What Rarity is, is beautiful. She isn't provocative, just enticing. She doesn't have "a round boo-tay" she has a curvaceous rear. She's above making colts want her, she makes stallions fall for her, and THAT is how she rolls.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:39:31 UTC from web-
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:40:35 UTC from web-
@cptscoot me gusta
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:41:23 UTC from web -
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:41:32 UTC from web
-
@seanthebluesheep perverted creep? or absolute genius? I know which I've chosen
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:42:04 UTC from web-
@cptscoot There's no denying that he's a talented artist, (http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/11283806719/1/tumblr_lsv80lMwqt1r2r7jp) but he's also a pervert (http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/10188253708/1/tumblr_lrhpyied8S1r2r7jp) Just look at page 25 of his tumblr. As for that Rarity pic, I think you'll find that's from Suited for Success, when she was miming flirting with the Canterlot crowd. She isn't above flirting, but that's not being provocative, that's being pouty. She's striking a pose, not spreading a pose.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:58:28 UTC from web-
@seanthebluesheep He is EXTREMELY open about his perversion and that is something I prefer to admire more than anything else. He finds ponies to be sexy and more power to him, plus he's an artist and I can't see why it should be a crime to use his talent in any way he chooses. Also I'm sure you're starting to get into "your opinion is wrong" territory here since you're saying I CAN'T think of Rarity as sexy even though it's not much of a stretch from beauty as is, especially by today's definitions.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 21:03:26 UTC from web-
@cptscoot So you don't deny it then? I'm not saying you can't, I'm saying that it's not in character for her. It's not wrong as such, but it's not right. As it is, while the two words are very similar and they're not much more than a step away from each other, it doesn't change the fact that Rarity doesn't "do" sexy. You can think she's sexy all you want, but that's not her character.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 21:10:48 UTC from web-
@seanthebluesheep Denying john joseco draws perverse images is like denying that movies are moving pictures. It's all facts after all, but again you're saying that her being either sexy or beautiful is entirely down to her character and not -in fact- entirely objective from how I view her character. Stop telling me I'm wrong on how I see her compared with how you see her, it's all opinions.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 21:14:48 UTC from web-
@cptscoot Yes, but you were saying "Pervert or genius" as if he were one or the other. And bleh, I suppose you're right, but I leave you with this: Ray Bradbury was once told that he was interpreting his own book, Fahrenheit 451 wrong when he said it wasn't about censorship. At the end of the day, it is what the creator wants it to be about, and your opinions are either validated or invalidated, and I think that while it shouldn't stop you from having that idea, you should take stock in what was intended.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 21:20:03 UTC from web-
@seanthebluesheep ATTENTION: Sometimes I am JOKING!! He is both, of course he is, I was kidding like I almost always am. Also that's all well and good but, opinions are not ever invalid I'll have you know, that is the bit that annoyed me the most about what you just said.
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 21:22:26 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@seanthebluesheep http://i.imgur.com/FlzqA.png also this
Wednesday, 26-Oct-11 20:48:36 UTC from web
-
-
-
