Conversation

Notices

  1. I'm talking about ponies. On RDN. What happened?

    Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:06:05 UTC from web
    1. @nerthos Dude. I know. The other day here someone asked me "what's your cutie mark", and I giggled. And answered. WHAT HATH PONIES WROUGHT?

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:08:36 UTC from web
      1. @patch "Oh no, WHAT DO I DID LAST NIGHT? DON'T TELL ME I HAVE A BUTT TATOO"

        Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:10:55 UTC from web
        1. @nerthos Man. Almost. In all seriousness, I've been considering a pinkie-pie/GIR tatoo for about a year now. If I still want them next year, they are going into my flesh. Forever.

          Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:14:30 UTC from web
          1. @patch FOREEEEEVERRRRRRR

            Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:16:05 UTC from web
          2. @patch GIR? DO IT. I would never even consider a tatoo, too vain for them, they don't fit in the least with my sense of aesthetics. But if you like them, go ahead xD You can erase them now, so it's not as permanent as it was years ago.

            Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:16:44 UTC from web
    2. @abigpony No, the admins don't like me being a dick. I was only moderated once, and it was because I was clearly and deliberately pushing the rules to the limit of what's permitted.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:10:04 UTC from web
    3. @abigpony You were on your last warning for being a dick. You continued to be a dick to the extent that multiple users complained about your behaviour. You got banned. Action, meet consequence.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:10:38 UTC from web
    4. @abigpony The point is, you were warned about that lots of times.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:14:59 UTC from web
    5. @abigpony Better than nothing I guess, yeah?

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:15:38 UTC from web
    6. @abigpony if outbreaks were such a problem you would think I would have been dealt with a while ago

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:20:05 UTC from StatusNet Android
    7. @abigpony Some of them are fun, but you tend to be disrespectful and agressive in your posts.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:20:23 UTC from web
    8. @ponydude2143 @nerthos I've only ever seen coverup work. I wouldn't want to erase a tattoo in any case. Their permanence is a statement to oneself, and integral to the idea. At least in my toast. I mean opinion.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:21:13 UTC from web
      1. @patch Yeah, that's the point of them. I don't like because it's like saying "Screw you, body, your integrity doesn't mean anything to me" the only marks I have are from accidents, or, one in my ear, from an assasination attempt.

        Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:24:25 UTC from web
        1. @nerthos I respect that attitude. The body is about all we own.

          Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:29:41 UTC from web
        2. @nerthos And our history. I suppose if we own anything, it would be our past.

          Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:35:04 UTC from web
          1. @patch The past is not ours, since every situation in wich we were involved could been orchestrated by someone else. Our body is the thing that we have more control over. Some would say "our minds are ours" but they're too easy to work with, so that argument can be easily discarded.

            Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:37:50 UTC from web
            1. @nerthos I disagree with you about the past, but I think I understand your point--we can't own, really, what was forced on us.

              Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:39:08 UTC from web
    9. @ponydude2143 That depends of your skin tome. In me, a removal wouldn't be too obvious, because my skin color matches almost perfectly my scar tissue color. But with a darker skin tone, they look either like a white stain, or a dark brown one.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:22:35 UTC from web
    10. @abigpony what the hell does Skype care?

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:22:41 UTC from StatusNet Android
    11. @abigpony You don't make the decisions, but you control how you act.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:23:53 UTC from web
    12. @abigpony Hmm. Whelp. Goonight.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:27:36 UTC from StatusNet Android
    13. @abigpony No, it's not entirely true. You can, obviously, with enough knowledge, charisa and skill, choose the response and outcome, focusing in the individual you want to manipulate and his way of interpreting things. But that doesn't mean that one person's behavior is only ruled by the "call", you can choose how to build your response to it. Most people here either can't or don't care to manipulate the responses of others.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:31:04 UTC from web
    14. @abigpony No, you're confusing "people" with "human cattle", the diference is that the first group can decide over their actions, and the second group are, the usually portrayed stereotype of high shchool US students, to give an example, governed by their instincts and anyone willing to spend five minutes to use them and bend their limited minds. It's all a matter of senitence. Some aren't able to choose how they react to things in their entire life, so they die young or are used as tools by others. Some others, are born with the skill to rule over their and other's minds with ease.

      Wednesday, 14-Dec-11 07:42:24 UTC from web