Conversation

Notices

  1. @alargesmallhorse If it's publicly available, there's nothing creepy about investigating it. It's there to be read. Research is not a social crime. >_<

    Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:37:30 UTC from web
    1. @psykozohedron nor is internet creeping. I'm just stating it. Stalking is another matter, but that's not what I was accusing people of.

      Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:38:49 UTC from web
      1. @alargesmallhorse I said "social crime", to distinguish from legal, which means I am stating that calling it names like that or the suspicious disapproval it seems to attract from people like you is inappropriate and unjustified.

        Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:41:22 UTC from web
      2. @alargesmallhorse It's just research. Not spying.

        Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:41:56 UTC from web
        1. @psykozohedron I never mentioned spying either. What I mean is just taking her as a person and obsessing over her and her actions and keeping up with her like a gossip column or something. This extends to attempting to contact her privately or something and making stuff like that song or whatever. We obsess way too much over the people who work with the show.

          Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:46:33 UTC from web
          1. @alargesmallhorse Tara makes following her just too fun. ;)

            Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:48:01 UTC from web
            1. @pony She really does.

              Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:49:51 UTC from web
              1. @alargesmallhorse hehe!

                Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:50:28 UTC from web
          2. @alargesmallhorse It is also permissible to adopt an obsessive interest that remains within the range of publicly accessible data. There is no inherent wrong in private communications, either. AFK...

            Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:53:50 UTC from web
            1. @psykozohedron You're pretty far in this, aren't you?

              Sunday, 01-Apr-12 08:55:12 UTC from web