Conversation
Notices
-
@widget Yep, so true. One of the many reasons I'm not changing, just improving upon it a bit.
Sunday, 22-Apr-12 00:46:20 UTC from web-
@supercammy You can always talk in ROT13
-
@supercammy You can talk about spoilers, just has to be ROT13'd and with a @spoiler tag. http://rot13.de/
-
@supercammy If you've got one of the refresh scripts you can encode your #spoilers, like so; "abg n erny fcbvyre" and nopony will know
-
@minti Talking of spoiler tags, I've got a patch to !MintRefresh that I'm about to push, so expect a pull request shortly. :)
-
@bitshift Alright. ^^
-
@greydragon412 Cesar describtion - the only ones even I can program.
-
@greydragon412 Yeah, that's what i wanted to say. These are the moments I should use leo.org...
-
@greydragon412 Ie rqiysqbbo yv Y udsetu jxyi myjx HEJ16, oek'bb ijybb ru qrbu je vywkhu yj ekj? ;)
Seth Edwards likes this. -
@greydragon412 XD Was wondering if you could figure it out. I love cryptography. >_>
-
@eaglehooves @greydragon412 Kind of but not really.
-
@minti ROT16? (Why was numlock off?)
-
@greydragon412 I meant to make it rot16 but I messed up so now it's basically rot16 shifted by a few characters. xD
-
@greydragon412 I don't think it has a name. It could but I doubt it would be a ROT-X variety now. Now it's more of a simple replacement cipher lol
-
@minti Still looks like ROT16 to me. Of course, the trouble is that ROT13, being the only one half the size of the alphabet, is the only one with the property of its encoding being _identical_ to its decoding. :P
-
@greydragon412 I have problems with ROT13, but inverted? That would be easy to read.
-
@bitshift Thank you! <3
-
@bitshift Well I tried ROT13 on it and got gibberish so. :p
-
@conventrix Bleh I hate those, it catches your eyes a lot more than it should. Plus most people have custom styles and such.
-
