Conversation

Notices

  1. Triscy Triscy

    Hey... I'm Fluttershy. I saw this site and made an account. I hope you don't mind...

    Tuesday, 05-Apr-11 01:06:59 UTC from web
    1. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation SHA

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:31:00 UTC from web
    2. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation Whatever the latest version is at the time. Whenever a new version is released, it will become that version.

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:33:13 UTC from web
    3. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation When it is, that will become the answer; until then it is SHA-2.

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:35:37 UTC from web
    4. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation Always the strongest, so 512.

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:37:57 UTC from web
    5. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation None that I'm personally aware of, although NIST seems to think so or we wouldn't have SHA-3 upcoming.

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:41:06 UTC from web
    6. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

      @rotation The reasons are certainly evaporating rapidly anyway- memory, storage, and bandwidth are all quickly becoming large enough to eliminate all potential arguments in favor of using less secure hash functions even in embedded systems.

      Friday, 04-May-12 20:45:08 UTC from web