Conversation
Notices
-
Tuesday, 10-Jan-17 18:29:01 UTC from web
-
Tuesday, 10-Jan-17 18:30:09 UTC from web
-
-
@igor i was in the villinox group so before, that took precedence; even over the coffee group in this instance.
Tuesday, 10-Jan-17 18:33:05 UTC from web-
@awl Ok, but when I clic on your post, it throw me to the http://sn.jonkman.ca/group/1405/id group. On this new account, I haven't subscribed to the vinilox group...
-
Looks like your post addressed the !Coffee group at http://sn.jonkman.ca/group/coffee To ensure your messages go to the correct group, you need to unsubscribe from all the other !Coffee groups
-
@bobjonkman When I try to join I get "Unable to find services for rtsn@gnusocial.de." :(
-
@rtsn What page is displayed when you see that error message? The !Coffee group has a successful subscription from @vinzv@gnusocial.de so our servers have communicated successfully in the past. Sadly, I have logging turned off because it used to fill log files at the rate of about 20 kBytes/s...
-
@bobjonkman I go to http://sn.jonkman.ca/group/coffee and hit subscribe and enter rtsn@gnusocial.de then I get
"Internal Server Error
Unable to find services for rtsn@gnusocial.de. "
at http://sn.jonkman.ca/main/ostatus
It's a bit weird, never had this problem before neither here on .de, .no or when I had my own instance.
-
-
-
@bobjonkman "all the other !coffee groups"?? how many are there?!
-
@bobjonkman oh, and define "correct group" please. ;-) This is confusing! confuzzling, even.
-
@mk I see a total of five !Coffee groups: http://sn.jonkman.ca/search/group?q=coffee By "correct group" I mean the one you *want* to send messages to. The only way to ensure that is to unsubscribe from any other groups with the same name.
-
And I see that your server sees *six* different \!Coffee groups: http://oracle.skilledtests.com/search/group?q=coffee of which we have only four in common: on vinilox, oracle, status.fsf.org, and sn.jonkman.ca; sn.jonkman.ca sees one on loadaverage, and oracle sees one on identi.ca and quitter.se. So that's *seven* !Coffee groups now...
-
@bobjonkman what I really want is only *one* group for !coffee (or anyting, really). I think it needs to be easier to "discover" already-existing groups, so people would be less likely to create 'duplicates'. OR there might be a mechanism by which groups exchange their content automatically.
-
-
-
-
-
-
