Conversation

Notices

  1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

    I would rate that interview 9/10 on the spaghetti scale.

    Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:42:19 UTC from web
    1. - -

      @ceruleanspark true... but In would say partly fake for reasons you explained a couple pages back

      Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:43:00 UTC from web
    2. Scribble Scribble

      @ceruleanspark Times that rating by 100, and that's mine.

      Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:43:14 UTC from web
    3. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

      @mrconventrix This Howard Stern thing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATBuvElZZig Whilst it's obviously been pretty heavily edited to show bronies in a bad light, the fact that he was able to find 4 or 5 interviewees who would openly discuss what they whack off to in public is pretty high on the spaghetti meter.

      Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:44:07 UTC from web
      1. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

        @ceruleanspark 4 or 5 people out of thousands is not statistically significant.

        Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:47:06 UTC from web
        1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

          @toksyuryel You can't draw a statistically significant conclusion from that data alone, because a sufficient quantity weren't interviewed and the presentation is deliberately biased.

          Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:48:16 UTC from web
          1. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

            @ceruleanspark And yet in your statements you've been doing exactly that.

            Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:48:50 UTC from web
            1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

              @toksyuryel My statements are based on a wider sample size. Ie: day to day interaction with the community at large.

              Monday, 16-Jul-12 19:49:29 UTC from web