Conversation
Notices
-
@bitshift but... it worked there...
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:15:13 UTC from web-
@techdisk42 Yeah, hence why I deleted the dash. Clearly there is at least more nuance to this filter than my knee-jerk reaction led me to initially assume.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:16:42 UTC from web-
@bitshift It's regex based.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:17:02 UTC from web-
@minti So there's specific whitelisted things, such as whitelisting "Dick Grayson" overriding the blacklist on the single word "dick"? That seems ****bersome to maintain, but I guess it's at least workable.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:18:49 UTC from web-
@bitshift and your point, she is proven.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:19:10 UTC from web -
@bitshift ...really, word filter? Really?
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:19:18 UTC from web -
@bitshift oh boy I forgot widget had that one too
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:19:21 UTC from web -
@bitshift ****bersome, HAHAHAHAHAHA
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:19:42 UTC from web -
@bitshift I love ones that have problems with words like Damper, and benedicks
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:21:20 UTC from web
-
-
-
@bitshift More like they added some exceptions, as it was censoring that very name earlier.
-
@bitshift but in that case, it was specifically inputted that his name would not be censored. i do believe i saw somebody else say his name, had it censored, and it was subsequently inputted. TBH i think your point is more or less still valid.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:17:52 UTC from web
-
-
@minti I swear that wasn't intentional, though it's proving entirely the point I was trying to make. xD
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:20:37 UTC from web-
@Minti @Redenchilada@bitshift @nerthos As long as I can still say "Trippy" And "Mang" I think I'm solid.
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:22:42 UTC from web
-
-
@widget No? Eh. xD
Wednesday, 05-Sep-12 01:21:15 UTC from web
-