Replies to danielmikaelson, page 5

  1. @danielmikaelson Jefferson once observed how facts were difficult to support or explain, whereas opinions were so easy to elaborate on and justify due to how colorful language can be. Referencing this logic, I was suggesting all that stuff you've been saying which you called opinion seemed to be made to sound like fact. When you state your opinions like you would state facts, people catch on and don't like it.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:04:36 UTC from web in context
  2. @danielmikaelson @scribus is it wrong that I like where this is going?

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:04:26 UTC from web in context
  3. @danielmikaelson Yeah, I'm a mod, don't tell me to butt out when you're disrupting the site. And I can see the context. That's warning 2, watch yourself.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:04:25 UTC from web in context
  4. @danielmikaelson Son, you don't know what a "troll" is if you think I am being one in this scenario. http://ur1.ca/943ml

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:03:19 UTC from web in context
  5. @danielmikaelson If he's a troll, don't talk to him. Duh.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:01:12 UTC from web in context
  6. @danielmikaelson No. You don't get to spend several posts and thousands of characters ranting, then play the humor card. Drop it, and mind your feet as it falls.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:00:49 UTC from web in context
  7. @danielmikaelson Ponies don't turn anything into a joke, though.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 05:00:16 UTC from web in context
  8. @danielmikaelson some advice for thee: don't dress an opinion in dresses that fit facts' bodies better. It means your opinions are crossdressers, and even worse they kill credibility and people you talk to won't give your opinion a chance to be considered.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:59:48 UTC from web in context
  9. @danielmikaelson Man, I thought this conversation died. You really like provoking people and exaggerating yourself, don't you?

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:58:01 UTC from web in context
  10. @scribus @danielmikaelson Besides, the purple quesadilla is immune to humor.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:57:32 UTC from web in context
  11. @danielmikaelson The original post shows no signs of joking.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:56:52 UTC from web in context
  12. @danielmikaelson Dude, it's days old, drop it or get dropped. To clarify: No one wants to have this debate, you will be silenced if you don't stop. I appreciate your viewpoint and respect it and your right to have it, but this is not the place.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:56:25 UTC from web in context
  13. @danielmikaelson being buzzword compliant means you say all the words that would pertain to a given context without actually using them in a manner that suggest you are familiar with the subject matter in any form. For example, if a guy wants to convince someone he has a legit opinion on 2d fighters but doesn't play them, he'll sew in buzzwords other experts will recognize and pick up on, like frame-advantage and input delay, turtling, sandbagging, etc, in an effort to be perceived as having credibility and knowledge on the subject.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:54:54 UTC from web in context
  14. @danielmikaelson The first one to post "you Americans should vote for X!" is the one who initiates the debate.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:54:48 UTC from web in context
  15. @danielmikaelson "too long; didn't read".

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:52:15 UTC from web in context
  16. @danielmikaelson Just my 2 cents.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:50:30 UTC from web in context
  17. @danielmikaelson I see a lot of tl;dr, rambling, and general padding of the words. A thousand characters should be more than enough to argue any claims that are suited for arguing on a site such as this.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:49:59 UTC from web in context
  18. @danielmikaelson geez, put that in a blog post or something

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:45:47 UTC from web in context
  19. @danielmikaelson thou art buzzword compliant. You know those buzzwords, and aim to make them sound useful. You meet the buzzword quota most likely in the hopes of increasing the probability of your credibility by some arbitrary percentage.

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:45:09 UTC from web in context
  20. @danielmikaelson Holy damn, that's a simplistic and overzealous worldview! Way to generalize!

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:43:16 UTC from web in context
  21. @danielmikaelson I hate to talk so simply, but tl;dr

    Friday, 27-Apr-12 04:42:27 UTC from web in context
  22. @danielmikaelson I don't know what schools you have been in, but I didn't encounter any indoctrination there. You could argue that the system of marks for achievements and the dominant position of a teacher has a minor effect because it "teaches" that achievements are rational and that you have to accept authorities, but you can't prrevent that if you want an education system that helps you find a job...

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 21:41:38 UTC from web in context
  23. @danielmikaelson So it is an ideology of individual souveranity with a focus in virtue, tradition and localism along with family, religious and regional identity. Now there is someone like me - an individual who is not religious, has a non-traditional family picture and doesn't identify with locality. I also think that traditions are something to overcome and don't want them to limit my personal freedom. i understand that you value all those traditional values but they contradict personal autonomy since they are a mechanism of autocarcy.

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 21:36:49 UTC from web in context
  24. @danielmikaelson Anarcho-monarchis? so you want a monarch who doesn't do anything? Then why bother with the monarch in the first place?

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 07:15:51 UTC from web in context
  25. @danielmikaelson I don't exactl see the bad thing about that. Universal Education is very prudent for every Economy with that much welfare because you need quality to compete since you can't beat Korea with your prices. Therefore, you need highly qualified workers. Universal health care in another thing: noone wants to be left dying and you never know if you don't get cancer or something like that soon. I don't want to lecture you but I honestly don't understand what could be bad about those things...

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 07:14:55 UTC from web in context
  26. @danielmikaelson Founding member of the NATO after Occupation by Germany. Powerhouse econom becuse of oil. Social democrats in charge for quite a while. I don't see the Socialism.

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 06:55:48 UTC from web in context
  27. @danielmikaelson I apologize for my improper mindset to discuss such matters, but I doidn't exactly see you provide anything but bashing of other parties and shameless advertising of a candidate with as much support for him as I provided for mine. You may have never forced me to discuss it, but I do not very much like you using a common interest of ours to advertise your candidate on a site that is not to be used as an outlet for such things. Perhaps I am "running away" from this conversation, but I do have work to do and was willing to drop it when others were telling us to. I like to think I'm being the bigger man here, but I really just wanna drop this altogether for everyone.

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 06:54:28 UTC from web in context
  28. @danielmikaelson Norway is a socialist state? That's the first thing I hear...

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 06:46:46 UTC from web in context
  29. @danielmikaelson You posted political content in the first place

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 06:44:22 UTC from web in context
  30. @danielmikaelson This is over. Noone else wants to go farther and I don't either. Also, that's sort of a meme wherein it is a subset of the common "My Face When" seeing as how it was my face when you said that.

    Wednesday, 25-Apr-12 06:40:22 UTC from web in context