Replies to danielmikaelson

  1. @danielmikaelson It is never evil to be something - it only can be evil to do something. If you act on that sexual orientation, you will most likely cause suffering which is bad. I do not care about what is natural since we do not life in nature but in culture - a humanmade enviroment. If "unnatural" behaviour is bad, then don't forget that religion is not natural but cultural. I understand we never will agree- I disapprove of most things of orthodox christianity and based on your facebook account, we would very likely to beat each other up for political standoints as well - so let's agree we disagree.

    Thursday, 14-Jun-12 06:21:27 UTC from web in context
  2. @greydragon412 # I honestly wasn't following the conversation all that closely, but it didn't seem like @danielmikaelson was forcing his beliefs on anypony.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 23:16:20 UTC from web in context
  3. @danielmikaelson for the record, we understand you.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:47:39 UTC from web in context
  4. @danielmikaelson It's not a misunderstanding based on language. In my case, I was raised in a completely areligious environment, so I'm literally unequipped to deal with religious belief.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:45:48 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  5. @danielmikaelson You're not responsible for how others feel about your beliefs. You're only responsible for how you feel about theirs. That truth brings me peace. If you're taking off now I'll catch you later

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:45:46 UTC from web in context
  6. @danielmikaelson There is nothing unnatural about being gay, all species with a gender sometimes show such behaviour. Adult content may be considered unnatural, but that leaves no reason to consider clopping to be a disease while not thinking equally badly of other forms of adult entertainment (at least, it seems that only cloppers should be "fixed" in your opinion, and others don't need to be). It's important to be consequent here in order to not sound hypocritical or like a follower who doesn't think for himself. (Nothing I said is meant offensive, so I hope it doesn't come across as that)

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:38:33 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  7. @danielmikaelson WHO THE cherries ARE YOU

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:38:31 UTC from web in context
  8. @danielmikaelson yup no problem!

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:36:42 UTC from web in context
  9. @danielmikaelson Quick! Play the victim card yourself!!

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:36:27 UTC from web in context
  10. @danielmikaelson Does this "Love" by any chance take the form the form of encouraging them to "renounce" homosexuality so they can get into heaven?

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:35:01 UTC from StatusNet Desktop in context
  11. @danielmikaelson both you and the pony you DM must subscribe to one-another in order to exchange DMs

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:34:41 UTC from web in context
  12. @danielmikaelson Just so you're aware, you're not alone. I'm pansexual and my mother raised me in a home with female romantic partners, but I also believe marriage should be between a man and woman; I believe in abstinence until marriage, and I believe in not using clop material. You'll find many who are more liberal here, and some (usually far less vocal) who are conservative as I am in this regard. I feel it's important that you're aware, though, that ponies here are sensitive about gay rights issues. I've been told to stop talking about it before by mods, even when it wasn't me who brought it up. You may be advised to continue any lengthy conversations about the matter through Direct Messages (DM) [first subscribe then click Personal > Inbox > select recipient from drop-down]

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:33:21 UTC from web in context
  13. @danielmikaelson And that... IS bigoted

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:33:03 UTC from web in context
  14. @danielmikaelson Yeah. You said you don't think gays should be allowed to marry. Then, you said, "No, wait, other churches can totally do it." Who's changing what who's saying?

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:32:38 UTC from web in context
  15. @danielmikaelson Then what about an ORTHODOX gay couple??? Can they NEVER marry?

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:30:53 UTC from web in context
  16. @danielmikaelson I'm not. Being against someone having rights is oppressing them. Don't misinterpret what I said.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:28:17 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  17. @danielmikaelson I've said this before, hear me out... I genuinely have a slight sympathy for non-practicing pedophiles, because it is simply a sexual preference, not a purposeful act of evil. It is the same as someone being gay or bisexual, it isnt a choice, but we know that actually PRACTICING pedophillia IS a vile thing, wheras homosexuality in any form isnt.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:27:57 UTC from web in context
  18. @danielmikaelson Um sir cartoon are real. Children are. See the difference. I dont watch r34 or whatever but dont bash people that do.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:27:34 UTC from web in context
  19. @danielmikaelson actually they are 2 completely differrent things

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:27:04 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  20. @danielmikaelson That's not what being against something means. It means you want to shut it down altogether.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:26:29 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  21. @danielmikaelson >Oppressing anyone who disagrees with you. >Not a bigot. >Lolwut.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:25:47 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  22. @danielmikaelson So you support the oppression of another human being . . . out of Love?

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:24:47 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  23. @danielmikaelson Listen, the fact of the matter is that you're telling people that the fact they enjoy something you don't means they have to get counseling. I couldn't care less if you hated clop itself, but don't go around saying people who browse it are somehow "wrong".

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:23:20 UTC from web in context
  24. @danielmikaelson Holy logical fallacy, Batman!

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:20:21 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  25. @danielmikaelson "I don't hate gay people. I just feel like they shouldn't have the same rights as straight people"

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:20:09 UTC from web in context
  26. @danielmikaelson And yet you insist that they're required to get counseling for it.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:19:05 UTC from web in context
  27. @danielmikaelson Pedophilia is harming a child... physically and mentally, as well as being one of the most dispicable things imaginable... this opinion of yours seems quite flawed if im being honest....

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 15:18:45 UTC from web in context
  28. @danielmikaelson oh man everyone look at the bigotry in this statement

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 14:53:38 UTC from web in context
  29. @danielmikaelson I am against porn as well, but especially because of that I don't threat different kinds of adult content differently, I simply dislike them all. To me, your statement sounds awfully similar to something like "I hate marriages, therefore gays should not be allowed to marry" (please note that I am not implying you to be for or against gay marriage, as I do not know your opinion on that). At any rate, for me, it's a simple case of "they can do as they want as long as they don't shove it into my face". That I don't like it doesn't mean they can't enjoy it, especially with something this harmless.

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 08:26:13 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  30. @danielmikaelson I bet I could get 5 sane people to agree to pushing you down a flight of stairs. Consensus does not make right. Peoples sexual preferences are not a democracy

    Wednesday, 13-Jun-12 08:18:20 UTC from web in context