Replies to pony, page 48
-
@pony Right, but I don't understand the context here.
-
@foxgopher I mean confrontational.
-
@pony Come again?
-
@pony Probably? The furry fandom is structured significantly less pyramidally than the pony one, so it's not really feasible to answer that question unless you actually know someone.
-
@pony note: I'm not what most would call a manly man.
-
@pony Les Poissons takes second place.
-
@pony lol
-
@pony the joke was the Chicago Cubs
-
@pony ORO?
-
@pony I was quoting a bananas/skilled song
-
@pony Che?
-
@pony I think that stuff is expensive. It's too expensive to girl.
-
@pony you need to trimoff the excess - doesntatter how many cards LOOK good, only a few will be effective for your deck
-
@pony for future questions, bear in mind that I'm a judge
-
@pony i forget which section, but the comprehensive rules have a "dont make assumptions" general rule, in which it doesnt do something if it doesnt say it does it. My examples dont do that. Take the Rare version of Applejack. She gives a power bonus of no specified color - the rulebook and comprehensive rules both say it doesnt change color. There is no rule that says the color of the power bonus is determined from the source's color! Events dont even have colors, only (in previous examples) color requirements (like swing into action - requiring blue does not make it a blue event)
-
@pony it's easier than all this: the card templating is consistent across the board. Any power boost that does not have a color symbol tagged to it does not add any new color attributes, and those that specify with the color symbol(s) do. Easy peasy
-
@pony the rulebook has a direct example written which expressly states that power boosts that also denote color give the target that color for the duration of the effect. There is no amibiguity; none of the words' meanings are nebulous in any way
-
@pony that is like the standart work time for a standar worker, but they seem to think they are special
-
@pony it says in the rulebook that when a card conflicts with a rulebook rule, the card wins. So yes, swing into action or watch in awe will make a pony two-colored until end of turn, and during the score phase you will choose which color they count as for scoring. During the main phase they count towards your power requirements for either color but not both at once
-
@pony High paying jobs are usually 60 hours though
-
@pony you are luck, only since i started in the college there has been a general strike (professors, technician, cops, bus drivers, subway drivers, trash collectors, doctors and so on) each 2 years. There has not been it in this year yet, but there is a minor strike going on the college right now; at least they didnt close the restaurant this time
-
@pony i live real close to the capital. people here think they are revolutionary for doing these stuff. wanting to work only 3 days a week after getting a rise of 100% is not exactly reasonable
-
@pony The last strike I remember in the U.S. was a teacher strike more than 10 years ago.
-
@pony man, i think all the groups of workers here strike at least once in a year. Except professors/teachers, For them is once each 2 years
-
@pony oh, great
-
@pony incidentally, all spelling errors are courtesy of touch screen
-
@pony the simple answer is, forest owl only boosts other peeps's power, and does not give a color to them. Sweet and Kind specificwlly tells you it gives a color, as do things like swing into action. If a card givrs yoy a power boost of a specific color that lasts through the score phase, and yoy have a pony with two different colors, you have to choose a single one od those colirs for the peep to be durng the score phase
-
@pony I think black is implied to be the troublemaker cards anyway
-
and black if we wanna go there.. and I do want to go there.
-
@pony I think you mean "Green could be the element of Tacos, linked to Fluffle Puff, etc"