Notices by RDN's Lucifer (nerthos), page 5

  1. @scribus Fair. Discord or something? I'll bounce it over to him

    Friday, 06-Mar-20 00:41:36 UTC from web in context
  2. @nerthos @scribus also he asks if you have a twitter

    Thursday, 05-Mar-20 06:31:39 UTC from web in context
  3. @scribus Carcino sends his regards http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875456

    Thursday, 05-Mar-20 05:49:32 UTC from web in context
  4. @thismightbeauser So you not only need to completely reshape the economy of most countries but also need to regulate the population of each to levels their own land can sustain (without further destroying the environment to grow more crops)
    Some countries have a food surplus of 10 times their internal consumption, so they can keep their current populations without issue. But what happens with a country that has a food deficit of say, 50% of consumption? the population has to be cut in half or starve. Either way, you have a disaster in your hands with no clean way to solve it. You can pick between genocide, mass starvation or civil war, neither acceptable by any humanitarian standard. And you can be sure it'll spill to neighbouring regions.

    In short, environmental damage is such a big issue because there's no clean way of solving it, nations and fortunes depend on the wheel spinning, and genociding the world to a sustainable population numbers is off the table.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 16:58:01 UTC from web in context
  5. @thismightbeauser An actual solution to the issue is deglobalization of economies and achieving food and industry autonomy in every relevant country, but good luck cutting the flow of shekel just like that. There is a reason any sort of nationalism is treated as evil incarnate by mainstream political parties and economic groups, a global market that depends on countries not being self-sufficient is extremely profitable, no one can stop buying or selling or their internal situation crumbles within months.
    A secondary effect of this, while a positive from an environmental point of view, is that a lot of countries simply don't have the capacity to achieve food autonomy due to having bigger populations than their fertile land can sustain. Take Nigeria for example, <1 million km2 of surface with a rapidly growing population at 190 million right now. Without world trade the country would starve, and lead to open war in the region.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 16:50:53 UTC from web in context
  6. @thismightbeauser At the scale that'd be required? yes. Chernobyl was just radiation leakage followed by human abandonment of the region. Blasting India and China with enough firepower to cease human activity would also glass every living creature, animal or vegetal, within the region and destroy the soil. Most of the upper soil layer is organic matter and full of bacteria, superheating it would make it barren. Maybe in a few thousand years new ecosystems would form, but for the first few decades it'd be an ashen desert. Also there'd be worldwide impact from the dust and debris causing a nuclear winter.
    You could aim exclusively for the urban and industrial centers to only eliminate polluting hotspots, but that'd mean retaliation, and climate damage is a much better option than a nuclear hot war.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 16:43:17 UTC from web in context
  7. @nerthos The one nation that might be able to pull themselves off this mess is ironically Russia, as they have been consistently ensuring their economical stability and independence through hard backing of their currency for the last decade, and have enough of an arsenal to deter any military intervention.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 06:17:11 UTC from web in context
  8. @thismightbeauser Consider: china has a debt leash in nearly all major economies, and any attempt at imposing environmental restrictions could be easily countered by them with a threat of crashing the challenging country's economy within a day.
    The countries that would actually listen to environmental concerns, which are mostly western nations, are already on a steady yearly drop of pollution and carbon emissions.

    There's no actual solution to the issue past unleashing nuclear fire on half of Asia, which would be an environmental disaster on itself.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 06:11:39 UTC from web in context
  9. @scribus The trick about it is noticing everyone is lying out of their asses, and just picking the lies you like most out of what's on sale.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 04:53:05 UTC from web in context
  10. @ceruleanspark It has been so long that I don't remember what I told you regarding the game. Glad you're enjoying it, though.
    AFAIK they've put some work in fixing the most glaring issues over the years, despite the crazy antics like the duping glitches and players chasing vips off the game.

    Monday, 02-Mar-20 04:49:19 UTC from web in context
  11. @mrmattimation http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875438

    Thursday, 06-Feb-20 07:18:23 UTC from web in context
  12. @scribus The great electoral boogaloo

    Thursday, 06-Feb-20 06:40:16 UTC from web in context
  13. @nerthos Whoops, I thought the filter would catch that

    Thursday, 06-Feb-20 06:38:22 UTC from web in context
  14. @mrmattimation Attachment. Jedi code didn't specifically outlaw going out whoring, just relationships. A jedi that doesn't give a single thought about an individual after having sex won't prioritize that individual's well being above mission or the jedi order, but one that has a wife and genuinely loves her will be hard pressed to put the order first even with very good reasoning as to why they should. There was even one high ranking jedi that was allowed officially to have concubines due to being one of the few last males of his species.
    Also in the case of padme, statutory rape maybe, we don't know the age of consent in coruscant.

    Thursday, 06-Feb-20 06:38:03 UTC from web in context
  15. I had the best terminator batcavepost but the file is too big :c

    Thursday, 06-Feb-20 06:33:58 UTC from web
  16. @scribus TFW my grandfather's nice revolver with mother of pearl grip got stolen ;_;

    Tuesday, 04-Feb-20 23:54:37 UTC from web in context
  17. @scribus That's true. I'm quite fond of cowboy action shooting and revolver ocelot types though.

    Monday, 03-Feb-20 23:41:48 UTC from web in context
  18. @adiwan Oh, yeah, the tv show. It is a bit loose in the overarching story department. The movies are more solid in that regard, but the events in them are somewhat ignored for the show.

    Monday, 03-Feb-20 23:41:19 UTC from web in context
  19. @adiwan The movies or the show?

    Sunday, 02-Feb-20 21:31:09 UTC from web in context
  20. @mrmattimation "El que lo dice lo es"

    Sunday, 02-Feb-20 21:29:28 UTC from web in context
  21. @adiwan CIA, Girl Scouts division.

    Sunday, 02-Feb-20 21:28:42 UTC from web in context
  22. @scribus That's true, rifle tricks are hard, and doubly so with optics attached.

    Sunday, 02-Feb-20 21:27:13 UTC from web in context
  23. @mrmattimation Still normal amounts, this guy just put down the money to buy all the magazines instead of the usual two or three mags + a cardboard ammo box to reload. 1000 9mm rounds are like $150 over the counter, so the guy probably spent like 15 bucks in bullets if reloading.

    Sunday, 02-Feb-20 21:26:43 UTC from web in context
  24. @adiwan I can vouch for the last bit, a perfect example is the marvel cape movies. They look just fine on tv or a cinema screen, but look at scenes in >1080 60fps on a high DPI cellphone screen and the actors look awkward, movement looks cartoony and poorly acted, you can notice the weird physics from cable pulls and all that.

    Friday, 31-Jan-20 22:48:32 UTC from web in context
  25. @scribus The longer guns tend to be easier, mostly because they're heavier and you have the sights farther away from eachother, as well as better grip. I remember my cousin taking about how he couldn't hit anything with handguns but had no issues with a FAL. Handguns do have the advantage in quick target aquisition since they don't require you to focus your vision as much.

    Friday, 31-Jan-20 22:45:28 UTC from web in context
  26. @mrmattimation That's about 250 rounds downrange assuming they're 30 round mags loaded to 28, it's not a lot for proper practice. Most people who take it seriously will do 200-300 once in a while. It doesn't cost too much if reloading the cases. Semi-auto rifles eat through ammo really fast so going to the range with only a mag or two means you'll run out of fun in minutes.

    Friday, 31-Jan-20 22:40:59 UTC from web in context
  27. @scribus Too old to join space force? No worries, you can still fight space ISIS from the home front.
    I'm from Buenos Aires and I say kill 'em all http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/875417

    Thursday, 16-Jan-20 00:18:45 UTC from web in context
  28. @awl Same to you awl! though I suppose in your case, we still keep in contact.

    Sunday, 05-Jan-20 16:07:08 UTC from web in context
  29. @ceruleanspark Same, we've all drifted apart over the near decade that passed. My contact info remains the same as always though, if you or anyone ever wants to hang out.

    Tuesday, 31-Dec-19 11:27:39 UTC from web in context
  30. Happy new year, to those that remain, and would still be called friends.
    May time never erode what was built, the chapter of our lives that we spent together.

    In perpetuity you will find a brother in me if that is what you desire.

    Tuesday, 31-Dec-19 11:24:27 UTC from web in context