Conversation

Notices

  1. Talking with Wall Street Journal for an article on bronies.

    Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:53:00 UTC from web
    1. @purpletinker be sure to mention what a great guy I am.

      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:53:53 UTC from StatusNet Android
    2. @purpletinker Ooh, sounds important.

      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:53:55 UTC from web
    3. @purpletinker Oh man. You do realise that if the article is anything less than 100% complimentary the fanbase will blame you for it, right?

      Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:56:52 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
      1. @ceruleanspark !blamepurpletinker in full force?

        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:57:34 UTC from web
        1. @redenchilada In all its glorious stupidity, blazing across the sky!

          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:58:47 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
          1. @ceruleanspark At a level that would be recorded in the annals of history for generations.

            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:00:13 UTC from web
      2. @ceruleanspark Of course. THEY contacted ME. I did not contact THEM. All I can do is do my best job at damage control.

        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:58:21 UTC from web
        1. @purpletinker I find myself wondering what the Wall Street Journal would focus on. Or are they not as economically focused as I think they are?

          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:59:27 UTC from web
          1. @scribus HEY GUYS LOOK AT THESE GROWN MEN PLAYING WITH LITTLE GIRLS TOYS ISN'T THAT WEIRD LET US ALL POINT AND LAUGH. (Spoilers: The media has the collective IQ of a highschool jock)

            Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:00:22 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
            1. @ceruleanspark I'd like to think the Wall Street Journal would at least dress it up in pretentious big words. Also, the Slate interview I did was pretty fair.

              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:02:25 UTC from web
            2. @ceruleanspark Just one, or the collective jocks of a single high school?

              Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:02:30 UTC from web
              1. @tenmihara Just one.

                Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:02:52 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
                1. @ceruleanspark Thought so

                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:06:24 UTC from web
              2. @tenmihara Is there a difference?

                Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:03:16 UTC from web
                1. @eaglehooves Not really; collective Jock IQ tends to be more of a hive mind thing

                  Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:07:21 UTC from web
        2. @purpletinker Well, It'll be interesting to read, at least. Those of us who aren't idiots understand. We've got your back.

          Thursday, 03-Nov-11 19:01:09 UTC from StatusNet Desktop
      3. @ceruleanspark exactly why only I should be mentioned.

        Thursday, 03-Nov-11 18:58:48 UTC from StatusNet Android