Conversation

Notices

  1. !movies "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows." If you liked the first one, you were probably, like me, pleasantly surprised by how well Robert Downey, Jr. played the detective. He keeps it up very well in this one. The chemistry and dynamic between Downey and Jude Law is nonstop, rapid-fire, and alternately hilarious and touching (no homo). Jared Harris made a great Moriarty, brilliant and subtly insane. The plot was not too convoluted; like a proper Holmes story, hard to predict but not hard to follow. In the first "Sherlock Holmes," there was a mechanic in fight scenes which is also used here (and improved, and played with, and all around brilliantly used). The cinematography did a great job of conveying the subjective perceptions of the different characters. Finally, if you're familiar with the original writings, you'll probably be pleasantly surprised at a certain twist which I won't give away (unless you have Holmsian perception). I dug it, B+. Would see again.

    Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:15:46 UTC from web
    1. @scribus @tenmihara More details on Sherlock 2 for you!

      Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:16:45 UTC from web
    2. @scribus Is it followable if you've not seen the first one?

      Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:18:14 UTC from web
      1. @thelastgherkin Yes. It isn't exactly a direct continuation of the first's story, though it does definitely come chronologically afterwards.

        Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:21:03 UTC from web
        1. @scribus Question two: is it better than Steven Moffat's #?

          Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:23:48 UTC from web
          1. @thelastgherkin Not familiar enough to judge that.

            Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:27:29 UTC from web
            1. @scribus You should tooooootally watch it!

              Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:29:14 UTC from web
              1. @thelastgherkin I shall look into it.

                Thursday, 22-Dec-11 20:29:45 UTC from web