Conversation
Notices
-
Hey internet I'm a straight white male in a first world country living in a warm house AMA
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 01:57:40 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal good job!!(8^D>)
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 01:59:10 UTC from web-
@dawson That's not a question
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 01:59:53 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal or is it?
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:01:33 UTC from web-
@dawson No, it isn't.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:02:09 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal are you sure?
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:02:33 UTC from web-
@dawson I'm not sure about anything these days.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:02:51 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal are you sure that two plus two is four?
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:03:47 UTC from web-
@dawson No, actually.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:04:06 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal me either
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:05:43 UTC from web -
@northernnarwhal seriously do you know?
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:07:13 UTC from web-
@dawson Depends. Mathematically, yes. From an epistemological perspective, not entirely.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:08:44 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal ..proceed
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:14:37 UTC from web-
If you insist I'll try and expand a bit. So like, math is a concept with rules, right? Cool. So within the confines of a mathematical context, using the set of real numbers as defined by the laws of mathematics we can determine 2 added to another 2 will result in 4. Now, the tricky part, like I mentioned earlier, comes with the epistemological side of this problem. Like, an empiricist might argue without tangible perception of this concept outside of its representation on paper there's no way of "knowing" it, whereas a rationalist might say knowledge is innate and therefore by thinking of 2+2=4 you prove that you know it. A follower of skepticism might say that the idea of 2 added to itself equaling 4 is not innate and is being manipulated by a force outside of our own minds, using a contrast case as an example, but a verificationist could argue this by saying that the use of math as a system validates and therefores proves the knowledge of 2+2=4.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:25:21 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal I have a question
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:25:57 UTC from web-
@mastertdi Hm?
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:28:13 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal I have lots of questions and they all start with "what" and end with confused vulgarities
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:28:50 UTC from web-
@mastertdi That's life.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:29:34 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal Part of me wants to understand what you said but most of me doesn't think I can handle it
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:30:08 UTC from web-
@mastertdi TL;DR version rainbowdash.net/notice/3757824
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:31:47 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal I was kind of hoping for an example of what else 2+2 could be but maybe that's missing the point
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:32:21 UTC from web-
@mastertdi Not to sound snobbish but that is missing the point entirely.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:33:20 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal classic me
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:33:35 UTC from web-
@mastertdi The problem is you're looking at it mathematically whereas the latter portion of my rant is giving examples of the epistemological difficulties of knowing 2+2=4. http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3757788
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:37:29 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal hm
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:38:55 UTC from web-
@mastertdi I'm bad at this, sorry.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:40:39 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal and this is why no one can call this site dum
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:41:18 UTC from web-
@dawson This site is dum. http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/813794
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:44:23 UTC from web
-
-
@northernnarwhal It's not your fault man. I'm bad at math whether it's math or not (if this is still missing the point then I'm being ironic)
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:42:20 UTC from web-
@mastertdi Basically I'm saying the problem with knowing whether 2+2=4 is not a mathematical one but a philosophical one.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:43:35 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal Let's both agree that this is just beyond me
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:46:53 UTC from web-
@mastertdi I don't think so. You're a smart guy.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:47:25 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal lol
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:48:11 UTC from web
-
-
-
@northernnarwhal you know,you could have made that a little bit...smaller
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:47:44 UTC from web-
@dawson You asked me to proceed and I did exactly that.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:48:59 UTC from web-
@northernnarwhal oh...good point..in that case,good job
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:49:36 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@dawson So basically my point is there are different ways of approaching the idea of knowledge. Do I know that 2+2=4? Maybe. At the end of the day it's up for us as people to decide our philosophies on such concepts based on how we understand them.
Sunday, 14-Dec-14 02:27:08 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-