Conversation
Notices
-
The Cabal has arrived.
Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web-
@darkw00d oh, and this is considered the multiverse theory by the way
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:33:54 UTC from web -
@darkw00d Reality is an illusion, the universe is a hologram
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:35:37 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Did you read "The Black Hole War," too?
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:40:48 UTC from web-
@scribus I was quoting Gravity Falls. I don't *think* the "Is the universe a hologram" tests have come back either way yet.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:41:54 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Ah. I know Leonard Susskind put forth a heartfelt and presumably well-reasoned argument for it, but he didn't entirely sell me. Though, that might just be because I'm dumb.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:44:59 UTC from web-
@scribus They're testing it at Fermilab right now using some methods and equipment I don't quite understand. The gist of it though is that they're looking extremely closely at the fabric of reality to see if they can see the pixels.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:50:31 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Ah, that one. Susskind's argument was more about the amount of information that can be stored in one place and entropy. But speaking of pixels, I guess those would arguably be Planck units, wouldn't they?
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:51:54 UTC from web-
@scribus For a given energy in a given volume, there is an upper limit to the density of information (the Bekenstein bound) about the whereabouts of all the particles which compose matter in that volume, suggesting that matter itself cannot be subdivided infinitely many times and there must be an ultimate level of fundamental particles, which Claude Shannon (Of "Shannon Entropy" fame posits to functionally be 1 bit. The holographic principle goes on to say that the entropy of ordinary matter is proportionate to its surface area, not its volume, because volume isn't real because the third dimension is an emergent phenomenon that doesn't functionally exist at quantum scales.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 17:04:27 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Yeah, that's about it. Susskind did go on about surface area being the deciding factor rather than volume, but I don't think he mentioned the third dimension being an emergent phenomenon, or at least not directly.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 17:05:54 UTC from web-
@scribus Well, nobody says anything directly in QP
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 17:09:56 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark True.
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 17:10:08 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@darkw00d oh, its actually fairly simple, i can explain that, just not the movie
Thursday, 12-Mar-15 16:36:46 UTC from web
-
