Conversation

Notices

  1. How can Gems be simultaneously non-gendered asexuals /and/ gay at the same time. It doesn't make sense.

    Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:11:26 UTC from web
    1. @ceruleanspark you can't explain that

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:14:28 UTC from web
    2. @ceruleanspark I had the same thought as well. We haven't seen any male Gem except for Steven. What's up with the "pregnancy" of Rose Quartz? Are Gems hatch out of the dirt?

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:26:02 UTC from Choqok
    3. @clayinthecarpet
      >2015
      >putting too much thought into a cartoon series

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:28:58 UTC from Choqok
      1. @adiwan and here I am creating a fandom around a 1:20 long video clip

        Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:29:38 UTC from web
        1. @rarity Which 1:20 long video clip?

          Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:32:24 UTC from Choqok
          1. @adiwan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvqXRFPU_aQ A mysterious cartoon intro that appeared with no previous mention of it anywhere on the internet

            Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:35:14 UTC from web
    4. @clayinthecarpet I agree. As much as I enjoy mindless crazyness like Regular Show I have a deep craving for series that have more on the inside. Adventure Time is one of these examples. It is mostly crazy but the ongoing mystery of the great Mushroom War is fascinating although it's always a footnote of the series.

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:36:30 UTC from Choqok
    5. @clayinthecarpet except not really because it's almost certainly a hoax/marketing campaign

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:44:34 UTC from web
    6. @clayinthecarpet yeah, have you read the two filled up /co/ threads digging into it

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:45:48 UTC from web
      1. @rarity I'm pretty sure that Neil Gibson zero history books are about a marking campaign such as this

        Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:48:01 UTC from web
        1. @vcgriffin did that book end with a rad cartoon getting released

          Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:49:11 UTC from web
          1. @rarity Not really no. But it was all about the slow drip drip release of a video, with internet commuties tracking down and analysing its origins, and a Big marketing company trying to get in on the act.

            Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:51:11 UTC from web
            1. @vcgriffin well it has been done before

              Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:51:56 UTC from web
    7. @clayinthecarpet things from nothing appearing on the internet until fall 2014, blog dates being altered to appear posted years ago, inconsistencies with VHS static (including cutting off right when we get a dramatic shot of our hero), either the production company at the beginning nor the writer credit exist on the internet, as well as the simple fact that /how has literally nothing existed about it before now/

      Thursday, 26-Mar-15 15:47:59 UTC from web