Conversation

Notices

  1. Today I'm playing "Grand Theft Auto", the Gameboy Advance game. Originally designed to be a straight port of Rockstar North's Grand Theft Auto III, GTA was instead produced as a prequel to the game, taking place in Liberty City a year before the events of GTA III. Rockstar Games, the publisher, had almost nothing to do with its production. Notably, Dan Houser, who's written every game in the series since the original game's London expansion packs, did not write this game, and Leslie Benzies, who produced every game since GTA III, did not produce this one. This remains the only game in the series not to be developed by Rockstar North or Rockstar Leeds, instead being developed by Digital Eclipse, the company responsible for the GBA Spyro games. Right off the bat, the title screen presents you with this logo that looks like it was done photoshopped by a fourth grader who just downloaded the Pricedown font. I think I'm in for a good time. http://rainbowdash.net/url/849198

    Tuesday, 26-Jul-16 11:59:27 UTC from web
    1. @mrmattimation it's an ok sequel to 1/'69/2, but definitely lacking in a lot of parts

      Tuesday, 26-Jul-16 12:03:43 UTC from shitposter.club
    2. @mrmattimation At least it's not as bad as the label of the PS1 game http://i.imgur.com/p1P44Jp.jpg MORE FLAMES! Only GTA London's label can beat its laziness and ugliness http://i.imgur.com/3ygFMZa.jpg . GTA 2's label is my most favourite of them all http://i.imgur.com/5Lwz2Y2.jpg I admit it's not the most imaginative but I like the composition and logo. Maybe I rate it higher than it deserves because I was so obsessed when it came out.

      Tuesday, 26-Jul-16 12:19:54 UTC from web