Conversation

Notices

  1. The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. @princesstrixie Pretty sure Cerulean would rather just ban everyone involved in the idea.

      Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:29:31 UTC from web
      1. @minti Sounds like a good idea.

        Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:31:13 UTC from web
        1. @omni Eh, I'd have to disagree. It's a stupid idea to turn RDN itself NSFW for a day, but not stupid enough to ban people over it. ;p

          Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:32:52 UTC from web
          1. @minti You guys will get your NSFW/Grimdark network when my CSS designer stops being lazy. But he still hasn't made the CSS I require...

            Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:33:59 UTC from web
            1. @omni Oh you're allowing NSFW too? Dump ALL THE TWIXIE. :D (Jk. xD)

              Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:35:24 UTC from web
              1. @minti You can't have a child-friendly Pinkamena Network, I'm afraid. I don't like such content so I won't participate in the community, but I can still manage the servers and so.

                Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:36:05 UTC from web
          2. @minti If RDN goes NSFW this is terrible.

            Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:34:29 UTC from web
    2. @princesstrixie Maybe I should just look into CSS myself, when I have some time...

      Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:35:34 UTC from web
      1. @omni Exactly what CSS? I may look into it too.

        Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:36:05 UTC from web
        1. @minti For a StatusNet network

          Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:36:17 UTC from web
          1. @omni I mean, specifically what? I know it's for StatusNet obviously. :p And do you plan to place any rules for/against clop?

            Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:37:50 UTC from web
            1. @minti The problem is, sometimes the line between non-clop and clop is hard to draw, especially when a network is already openly touching subjects like torture. Therefore, my original plan was to allow clop, but forcing users to make sure posts are properly tagged. Regarding the CSS, I was thinking of using StatusNet 1.1.0 with the 3-panel layout (I'm fine with considering another version, I don't know the differences but @ceruleanspark probably has a reason he is running this older version and not the latest), but theming should make any layout possible. I can't find the last stuff the CSS designer was doing back, but here is the design I made which probably makes you understand why I want someone who knows what he is doing to work on it instead: http://i.minus.com/i1eBRVDqUJYGp.png.

              Thursday, 12-Jul-12 14:58:02 UTC from web
              1. @omni The reason RDN is running this old version and not the latest is because it's extraordinarily difficult to upgrade from this version to the latest. Do not use this version if you aren't already stuck in that situation.

                Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:00:49 UTC from web
                1. @toksyuryel 1.1.0 it is, then, thanks.

                  Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:02:00 UTC from web
              2. @omni StatusNet 1.0.1 is infinity better than the current version running (mainly cause 0.9.7fix1's worth is basically 0 imho.) but, we're running an older version cause of the effort required to upgrade as far as I can tell. And uhh, statusnet is pretty hard to theme. I've tried my hand at it. You can change the look, but the basic layout has to stay the same or it like explodes. Several times. (Can you do that? Can you explode twice?)

                Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:01:48 UTC from web
                1. @minti Statusnet 1.01 is just as horrible as 0.9.7

                  Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:04:44 UTC from web
                  1. @ceruleanspark It has it's ups and downs. It's a *little* better cause they improved the API and such and optimized the code a bit I'm assuming. xD

                    Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:09:04 UTC from web
              3. @omni While I'd like a # network, I don't want to go to one specifically themed after grimdark :x.

                Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:02:34 UTC from web
                1. @toksyuryel Yeah, same. Very dark grimdark stuff actually tends to get to me, when light grimdark and clop totally does not affect me at all. xD

                  Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:03:59 UTC from web
                  1. @minti I tend to like clop tbqh :s

                    Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:05:31 UTC from web
                    1. @nakkecil22 I'm not into it personally, but I understand why people like it so I'm not all "EWWW GROSS GO AWAAYYYYY D:" Love and tolerate.

                      Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:07:09 UTC from web
                      1. @minti I actually don't like it for the err sexual aspect. Some of it I find hilarious, sometimes I find it legitimately entertaining for various reasons. Haven't used any of it as a springboard for fantasies yet tbh.

                        Thursday, 12-Jul-12 20:17:18 UTC from web
                2. @toksyuryel Perhaps can split it into two parts, like RDN has a "normal" and "RP" network. Or I can try to add rdnrefresh or so to it, allowing people to auto-hide either nsfw or grimdark (with tags), though I don't expect that to go well. Hmmm...

                  Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:06:17 UTC from web
                  1. @omni It's just the theme that bugs me. I don't mind people posting it, but I don't want to be on a site dedicated to it.

                    Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:07:42 UTC from web
                    1. @toksyuryel I guess a slightly less dark theme wouldn't be a bad idea, this one is way too dark anyway. But, well, I don't have a good designer.

                      Thursday, 12-Jul-12 15:09:05 UTC from web