1. The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. @widget Nice hat.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:50:23 UTC from web
    2. @widget Oh god it's horrifying!

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:50:43 UTC from web
    3. @widget it's on firefox, too. It's just mint refresh i guess.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:51:44 UTC from web
      1. @abigpony Firefox too? It only does it on Chrome for me, with both mine and widgets scripts. :/

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:53:02 UTC from web
        1. @minti Yeah.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:53:28 UTC from web
        2. @minti OBVIOUSLY firefox is ~InArGuAbLy SuPeRiOr~

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:54:24 UTC from web
          1. @redenchilada In terms of security I find firefox to be superior, but that's on the basis of extensions and not anything special about the browser itself. If those extensions were available for another browser, I'd probably consider switching.

            Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:56:01 UTC from web
    4. @widget are you my twin

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:51:49 UTC from web
    5. @widget Dude. I am exactly the same.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:52:21 UTC from web
      1. @toksyuryel Red doesn't look good on shirts. It's just silly. :(

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:53:18 UTC from web
        1. @redenchilada Besides everyone knows the redshirts die first.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:53:51 UTC from web
        2. @redenchilada In all seriousness though I do have a red shirt and it does look pretty nice. Got it from woot.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:57:50 UTC from web
    6. @widget Huh. Don't know why it was doign so for me in firefox.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:53:51 UTC from web
    7. @widget AdBlock Plus and NoScript.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:57:05 UTC from web
      1. @toksyuryel Both those exist for Chrome.

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:57:40 UTC from web
        1. @minti It has "an ad blocker" and "a script blocker", but afaik it does not have those *specific* extensions and that's what I mean. I don't want *any* script blocker, I want *that* one because it does a whole lot more than just block scripts.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:58:55 UTC from web
    8. @widget A microwave cooks faster than an oven, but which would you rather cook a turkey with? (this is an infallible comparison yes)

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:57:06 UTC from web
      1. @redenchilada Mmmmm... .Turkeyyyy...

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:57:50 UTC from web
      2. @redenchilada Oven, because BURN ALL THE THINGS.

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:59:11 UTC from web
    9. @widget Does it block exactly the same stuff as noscript in exactly the same way? Does it block all the other stuff that noscript also blocks? Does it support all the extra features (script surrogates etc) that noscript has? Etc. etc.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 01:59:59 UTC from web
      1. @toksyuryel @widget I know for a fact AdBlock works differently, and is done in a worse way cause of the way Chrome is sandboxed. (It injects CSS to hide the ad, lol.)

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:01:19 UTC from web
    10. @widget I don't have any desire to. Nothing about chrome interests me because it doesn't have the exact same extensions I have for firefox. I have better things to do than audit another browsers' extensions all day long. [s]Like playing Spiral Knights.[/s]

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:02:37 UTC from web
      1. @toksyuryel XD Firefox and chrome are basically equal now. Firefox is better at page load speeds, Chrome at after-page parsing due to V8. So there's no real NEED to switch over.

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:03:46 UTC from web
        1. @minti something something google saving browsing history blah blah rumors

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:05:16 UTC from web
        2. @minti >firefox >better page load speeds

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:06:30 UTC from web
          1. @abigpony It generally is, have you tried loading a page full of images on chrome, then on firefox while using a crap computer?

            Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:07:15 UTC from web
            1. @minti yes, many a time. Chrome is miles faster

              Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:07:38 UTC from web
              1. @abigpony Wtf gimme your computer then. Mine loads epically slow on a base install of chrome. I had to switch to firefox to read homestuck cause they were loading too slow LOL

                Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:08:28 UTC from web
                1. @minti lol, get on my level minti.

                  Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:10:55 UTC from web
        3. @minti Did Firefox ever fix its memory leak problem? I do prefer it, but have not tried it again in a long time due to that.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:07:37 UTC from web
    11. @widget How am I a jerk for not wanting to waste my time on something I don't care about? I don't think you know what the word "jerk" means.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:04:18 UTC from web
    12. @widget It's text. Without an emoticon it's atonal.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:05:29 UTC from web
      1. @toksyuryel yeah '-'

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:05:58 UTC from web
      2. @toksyuryel Even so, try saying what you said, then add a few modest "sorry, but"'s in there and say it again. One sounds worse.

        Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:06:29 UTC from web
        1. @minti Sorry, but adding random "sorry, but"s to your words only makes them sound more condescending. At least to me.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:07:29 UTC from web
        2. @minti But I'm not sorry. I already stated my requirements and he chose to ignore them and press on. I don't have to apologize for getting a little impatient after that.

          Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:07:47 UTC from web
          1. @toksyuryel Fair enough, just trying to offer how I'd handle not looking like a "jerk" in that situation. It's always a good idea to not be as blunt as possible, cause generally people take it the wrong way when you are.

            Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:11:08 UTC from web
            1. @minti Blunt is the only way I know how to be =/

              Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:11:32 UTC from web
              1. @toksyuryel Can't help there then, I've always been a softy. XD

                Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:13:12 UTC from web
                1. @minti *plushiehug* plushies are soft ☺

                  Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:15:04 UTC from web
                  1. @toksyuryel >< You and your plushification hugs.

                    Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:16:55 UTC from web
    13. @widget Seemed like it was to me. I never expressed any desire to switch browsers. You said "why don't you check for yourself?" which seemed to imply that you thought I did and was complaining about something or other.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:10:03 UTC from web
    14. @widget I assure you I'm not.

      Saturday, 21-Jul-12 02:17:49 UTC from web