Conversation
Notices
-
So I just read all the the stuff on the MaxVeers thing including the initial post/conversation. I don't fully understand what this is all about. Can someone more clearly enlighten me to exactly what happened?
Friday, 14-Sep-12 06:45:16 UTC from web-
@abigpony It was something about not outright rape but neither consensual sex.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:04:34 UTC from web-
@nerthos reading through it, it looks like she offered, he didn't finish, then she blamed him. is that right? because that's just rude.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:09:36 UTC from web-
@abigpony Maybe. I just dropped it after a while because it was boring. But it can be either the usual butthurt woman who offers herself, or the guy who coerces the girl for sex. I'd lead towards the first option because it's the most common of the two.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:12:32 UTC from web
-
-
@nerthos @abigpony And then it exploded when somebody posted something extrapolating from a few people defending him to "BRONIES ARE ALL RAPISTS AND/OR RAPE APOLOGISTS".
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:10:32 UTC from web-
@bitshift I really don't know who to side with. I'm leaning towards him, but I guess it still TECHNICALLY is rape. She seems pretty trashy, though.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:11:48 UTC from web-
@abigpony Considering part of his argument was literally "you said no, but I couldn't read your tone so I thought you were okay with it", I'm pretty sure I'm not siding with him. She definitely made some bad decisions, but he is certainly not in the right either.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:13:47 UTC from web-
@bitshift So both are bad. Guess it's good enough of a conclussion.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:15:15 UTC from web -
@bitshift Well just like they said, that's the part where it gets confusing. She offered the act and by the time they got back, he didn't finish. I understand her urgency and I understand he misunderstood her considering she offered it in the first place and whatnot, but this leads to both of them being in the wrong. She seems like she's taking advantage of a situation she put herself in by bending it to her aid. Again, this is why I asked is because I don't fully understand what is happening with it.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:17:29 UTC from web-
@abigpony At the very base level, he was 20 and she was 16. Any sexual act they do is statutory rape.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:21:38 UTC from web-
@thelastgherkin She initiated it. I understand the age makes it statutory, but since she initiated it and she called for it, it doesn't seem like rape to me.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:23:51 UTC from web-
@abigpony And that's why you're not a lawyer.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:31:33 UTC from web-
@thelastgherkin so where's your rebuttal
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:32:19 UTC from web-
@abigpony I don't see that I need one. I brought up an illegal activity they are both guilty of regardless of this particular incident.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:36:33 UTC from web-
@thelastgherkin Well if she wanted it, it wasn't rape, which is the whole issue here.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:39:49 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
@thelastgherkin Wait, isn't the minimum age 16?
-
@derpyshy That depends on the country. The more f***** up and prone to lawsuits the place is, the higher the age. It's 18 here.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:34:45 UTC from web -
@derpyshy Depends on where you live.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:35:27 UTC from web-
@thelastgherkin @nerthos Heh. It's 16 in Norway, atleast. (That's also the minimum age that you can get arrested) But if someone that's 16 and one that's 15 do it, the one at 16 gets arrested. I don't kmow if it's the same in america, though.
-
@derpyshy Yeah, but law is not always fair. It's a case sensitiv thing.
Friday, 14-Sep-12 07:41:20 UTC from web-
@nerthos Yup. Some laws are weird x.x
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
