Conversation

Notices

  1. I’ve always subscribed to John K’s character design philosophy that more expressive > more consistent and that keeping a character exactly on-model all the time isn’t very fun to look at, so imagine my surprise when I learn that cartoon watchers these days not only want characters to be drawn the exact same way in every frame because if it’s not on-model it’s “lazy”, but they ALSO want those exact same faces to be redrawn every time because if you reuse a drawing that’s also lazy. What, exactly, is the point in redrawing things if you’re going to want it looking exactly the same as it did in the last shot, scene, or episode? We should all just use Flash puppets at that point and go back to 2008-era Newgrounds.

    Monday, 03-May-21 23:47:03 UTC from web
    • @zeldatra OK I need to confess, I still have yet to successfully wrap my head around how, exactly, the audience would even know if an exact replica were achieved by copy-paste or by redrawing...

      Tuesday, 04-May-21 15:49:48 UTC in context
    • @scribus They don’t. I saw somebody claiming the other day that pre-digital stock footage was ok because you can’t reuse cels so they had to redraw the sequence it every time which is obviously 100% untrue. It’s based entirely on whether you personally like the show in question or not because subjectivity is out of style, there has to be an objective reason now why you don’t like it (“it’s lazy” being the most common one).

      Tuesday, 04-May-21 19:18:30 UTC in context
    • @zeldatra OK now I can't grok how cels aren't supposed to be reusable, if anything it seems obviously and imminently reusable

      Tuesday, 04-May-21 21:01:46 UTC in context
    • @scribus You’d think so, right? Ultimately the people who make those arguments have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about. Or they heard that Disney used to wash cels in the 60s when they were on the verge of bankruptcy and assumed that EVERYONE did that.

      Tuesday, 04-May-21 21:41:41 UTC in context