Replies to rarity, page 34

  1. @rarity yeah, well officially now at least. Is been a common way to call the country for a long time before.

    Friday, 13-May-16 23:38:18 UTC from web in context
  2. @rarity Just say "homage."

    Friday, 13-May-16 23:26:20 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  3. @rarity Rad.

    Friday, 13-May-16 23:05:36 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  4. @dtluna @rarity @mrmattimation :(

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:30:53 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  5. @mushmouth @mrmattimation @rarity no dic pics without encryption

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:30:36 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  6. @dtluna @rarity @mrmattimation i don't even have pgp setup yet should get that done.

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:25:22 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  7. @mushmouth @mrmattimation @rarity and do I have your PGP key?

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:24:55 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  8. @mushmouth @mrmattimation @rarity remind me 3 hrs later

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:24:36 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  9. @rarity @mrmattimation that reminds me @dtluna when you going to show me your FrankerZ?

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:22:43 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  10. @rarity I'll tweet the link regardless of whether or not the stream is NSFW so if I don't post it here I'll post it there.

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:22:26 UTC from web in context
  11. @scribus @rarity im also always asking for source without realizing it could be his/hers

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:11:02 UTC from gs.smuglo.li in context
  12. @rarity I keep forgetting you draw now! I'm always, "Hey cool, where'd you find that?" #

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:09:34 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  13. @rarity whoa, this is rad

    Friday, 13-May-16 00:06:25 UTC from web in context
  14. @rarity It's really weird how the arguably most advanced society in the world, tech wise, has these social customs likely viewed by most Americans as old-fashioned, traditional, or even archaic in some cases.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 23:01:21 UTC from web in context
  15. @rarity Oh, I'm well aware. I just think it's funny given how much stigma it got after WWII.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 22:49:22 UTC from web in context
  16. @rarity I've got family even deeper on the Mexican side of the Whitesican spectrum who (at least on FB and IG) are pro-Trump. It's absolutely baffling, like if Adam Sandler came out as a neo Nazi.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 12:43:31 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  17. @rarity I get that a lot.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 01:42:54 UTC from MuSTArDroid in context
  18. @rarity Hey I saw a flogger in Warframe not long ago, and everyone thought them extint in 2009.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 01:41:53 UTC from web in context
  19. @rarity You do have an advantage over here: voting isn't mandatory, so people who have no interest or don't know what they're doing can and often just skip voting.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:32:23 UTC from web in context
  20. @rarity Seeing who could catch a greased pig the quickest would be a better system than what we have here...

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:31:00 UTC from web in context
  21. @rarity We call it "ballotage", I'm not familiar with the term "runoff", but it might be the same thing. In the second round a candidate needs a simple majority to win. 50.01% is enough to win.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:30:14 UTC from web in context
  22. @rarity My friend Andrew put it into words really well. She just wants to be an answer on a history test.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:28:28 UTC from web in context
  23. @rarity We have a first round where a candidate needs a 40% of the votes AND at least 10% of difference from the second candidate to win, and a second round between the two candidates with the highest vote counts if no candidate manages to achieve those two conditions.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:27:42 UTC from web in context
  24. @rarity I avoided going for the third party as it was absolutely necessary to keep Scioli off winning first round, as Macri only had a chance in the second round with the opposition being split between him and Massa. But I don't know how the system works over there or anything.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:25:07 UTC from web in context
  25. @rarity I cannot in good conscience do that. Trump and Clinton are too close in polls right now for me to even think about voting for a third party, as much as I'd love to do that.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:24:52 UTC from web in context
  26. @rarity Well I guess I can understand that. I voted Macri after all because it was a chance of the bad guys being right, and a chance at them being wrong and things going well, which turned out to be the case. The alternative was 100% assured impunity to the corrupt and collapse of the economy. So I guess you're doing the same in your own way, from the way you see things.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:21:08 UTC from web in context
  27. @rarity I'm taking the position of "I'm not sure if he'll be great, but I'm not sure he'll be terrible either", which is a neutral position. I dislike the north american right as much as anyone else.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:17:39 UTC from web in context
  28. @rarity @nerthos Yeah, that's the thing. I HATE Clinton. Hate everything about her. But at least four years of Clinton after Obama would be like four years of Bush after Reagan. Just more of the same until somebody better comes along and steals re-election.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:13:40 UTC from web in context
  29. @rarity Well, I'm not saying he CAN'T be a disaster, but I won't tell myself he absolutely will be until he actually does anything bad.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:07:46 UTC from web in context
  30. @rarity That last sentence is interesting to me because I've had this theory (a desperate hope, more like) that he's taking a page out of Nixon's book and pretending to be an absolute lunatic to expand his press coverage and deter our enemies.

    Thursday, 12-May-16 00:01:34 UTC from web in context