Notices tagged with firefox, page 2
-
Newest version of #Firefox broke HTTPS Everywhere... what is this I dont even
-
Experimento de comparativa de consumo de RAM.
Aprovechando que en Debian Testing todavía estamos en la versión 52.5.0 de Firefox ESR, y que ya tengo instalada, al mismo tiempo la 57 Quantum, me propuse hacer un ejercicio de comparativa de consumo de RAM entre ambas versiones.
Las publicaciones en distintos sitios van encaminadas a comparar Firefox Quantum con Chrome, abriendo un determinado número de pestañas en ambas.
Yo, al no tener en mi equipo Chrome, no puedo realizar esa comparativa, pero si mirar que diferencias hay entre la "antigua 52" y la "novedosa 57".
Allá va. Primero vemos el consumo de RAM nada más iniciar el navegador en ambas versiones. Todo el trabajo va con el comando ps_mem:
(primero siempre la versión 52 y luego la 57) https://quitter.es/attachment/1320305 https://quitter.es/attachment/1320306 !gnulinux #firefox #quantum -
Experimento de comparativa de consumo de RAM.
Aprovechando que en Debian Testing todavía estamos en la versión 52.5.0 de Firefox ESR, y que ya tengo instalada, al mismo tiempo la 57 Quantum, me propuse hacer un ejercicio de comparativa de consumo de RAM entre ambas versiones.
Las publicaciones en distintos sitios van encaminadas a comparar Firefox Quantum con Chrome, abriendo un determinado número de pestañas en ambas.
Yo, al no tener en mi equipo Chrome, no puedo realizar esa comparativa, pero si mirar que diferencias hay entre la "antigua 52" y la "novedosa 57".
Allá va. Primero vemos el consumo de RAM nada más iniciar el navegador en ambas versiones. Todo el trabajo va con el comando ps_mem:
(primero siempre la versión 52 y luego la 57) https://quitter.es/attachment/1320305 https://quitter.es/attachment/1320306 !gnulinux #firefox #quantum -
xkcd: Workflow - https://xkcd.com/1172/ #Firefox #Quantum
-
#Firefox 57, finally the performance is really good!
-
xkcd: Workflow - https://xkcd.com/1172/ #Firefox #Quantum
-
@zatnosk I'm using #Firefox on #Mint #GNU-Linux. If it doesn't work on this, it's not very "open"
-
!TIL about
privacy.firstparty.isolateandprivacy.resistFingerprintingin #Firefox's about:config. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15570877 -
I noticed a reference to "30boxes.com" (external calendar service?) in #Firefox's about:config. Wonder what this does. http://qttr.at/1yyk
-
Had to manually force #multithreading in #Firefox 56 from #mozilla OBS repo in !opensuse strange that it wasn't default like normal release
-
strypey
strypey
, dorsett
, jitender
, paramjot35
@dorsett @jitender @paramjot35 comments about #ABP using lots of CPU/RAM make me sit up and take notice. I have had #Firefox issues...
-
I just had a weird bug with #Firefox, it hung and when I checked ps ax it was running over 1000 processes at once. Best way to report that?
-
#Firefox has a "Export Bookmarks to HTML" function (you can reverse to import as well). Is there a similar feature on the Android version?
-
Does anyone know where #Firefox for Android stores the bookmarks file or database?
-
@grmpyoldman That newspaper doesn't want me to read their news on this javascrippled computer that I'm using. Fortunately #Firefox has its "Reader view" that removes the big "YOU NEED TO WHITELIST US" blob.
-
I'm looking for something that can !self-host browser bookmarks for #Firefox, #Palemoon, #Chromium, #Opera. Is there a server + extensions that does this? Years ago, I used #Xmarks, but they were owned by the same company that owns #LastPass, so I'm not confident that my bookmarks would be private. (If I wanted public bookmarks, I'd use whomever bought #Del.icio.us.)
-
I'm looking for something that can !self-host browser bookmarks for #Firefox, #Palemoon, #Chromium, #Opera. Is there a server + extensions that does this? Years ago, I used #Xmarks, but they were owned by the same company that owns #LastPass, so I'm not confident that my bookmarks would be private. (If I wanted public bookmarks, I'd use whomever bought #Del.icio.us.)
-
As change by theologians the idea of this world of politics has always been OR continues to be considered a sort of people have the power to run the pope still uses #firefox os
-
@hannes2peer I think #Abrowser has some #Firefox plug-ins installed by default. I use #AdBlock+ and #PrivacyBadger
http://qttr.at/1rw7 -
Related: This is #useful, and insanely insecure, but sometimes I just rely on #Firefox and #KeePassX doesn't get a look in. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/password-exporter/
-
If Mozilla doesn't go back on its WebExtensions-only future, I'll have to abandon #Firefox. I rely on certain Firefox extensions that cannot be implemented in the WebExtensions model and others that don't work with multiprocess. At least for multiprocess, Mozilla still supplies dev builds that allow for single-process extensions to work. For now. But no such luck for when we enter the Brave New World of WebExtensions-only Firefox. Therefore I'll have to lock myself to FF 56 or quit FF entirely. Mozilla has completely forgotten that Firefox's greatest success came from giving users a thin browser that was entirely extensible. Locking things down as they've been doing only harms those of us who have been using it since the beginning. It's a knife in the back. And what Mozilla forgets is unlike back in the early days of Firefox, we have a hell of a lot more choices for when they papaya up like this. Fix this bullpapaya, Mozilla. Give us users the fr…
-
If Mozilla doesn't go back on its WebExtensions-only future, I'll have to abandon #Firefox. I rely on certain Firefox extensions that cannot be implemented in the WebExtensions model and others that don't work with multiprocess. At least for multiprocess, Mozilla still supplies dev builds that allow for single-process extensions to work. For now. But no such luck for when we enter the Brave New World of WebExtensions-only Firefox. Therefore I'll have to lock myself to FF 56 or quit FF entirely. Mozilla has completely forgotten that Firefox's greatest success came from giving users a thin browser that was entirely extensible. Locking things down as they've been doing only harms those of us who have been using it since the beginning. It's a knife in the back. And what Mozilla forgets is unlike back in the early days of Firefox, we have a hell of a lot more choices for when they papaya up like this. Fix this bullpapaya, Mozilla. Give us users the fr…
-
dear #lazyweb , someone know this add-on for #firefox http://qttr.at/1nl5 , i'm looking for info but have not found many references.
